Harm van der Heijden joins Solve's Customer Advisory Board

We are excited to welcome Harm van Heijden, a partner at NLO, to Solve Intelligence’s Customer Advisory Board.

Harm van der Heijden joins Solve's Customer Advisory Board

Harm is a Dutch and European Patent Attorney and partner at NLO and Ipsilon, advising clients in patent matters related to electronics, communications technology, and software. He holds an MSc in Applied Physics and a PhD in Plasma Physics from Eindhoven University of Technology, and is also experienced as an industry researcher and developer in signal processing, medical devices, and integrated circuit design. His combined technical and legal expertise covers areas such as computers, telecommunications, electrical and mechanical engineering, and physics. In addition to drafting and prosecuting patents, he is also active in litigation and licensing.

“As AI is transforming the IP industry, it’s essential for patent attorneys to have a front row seat. That’s why I’m honoured and excited to join Solve Intelligence’s Customer Advisory Board. Great things are coming!”

Harm van der Heijden, Partner, NLO and Ipsilon

“Harm's deep expertise and enthusiasm for AI will be invaluable as we continue innovating and enhancing our product offerings for patent practitioners worldwide, particularly in Europe. He has already provided extensive feedback to help us tailor our solutions for European clients - this has enabled us to specialize our patent drafting tools to better serve all European customers, and adapt our prosecution product to meet specific EPO requirements. His experience with contentious litigation at the Hague, national and EPO proceedings, and licensing negotiations will further strengthen our future product development and accelerate our launches.”

Harry Bedford, Founding Member of Legal & Product and UK & European Patent Attorney, Solve Intelligence

Check out the rest of our Customer Advisory Board here.

AI for patents.

Be 50%+ more productive. Join thousands of legal professionals around the World using Solve’s Patent Copilot™ for drafting, prosecution, invention harvesting, and more.

Related articles

Drafting for the EPO: How AI Can Make the New EPO–IP Australia PCT Pilot a Success

The EPO and IP Australia are launching a new PCT pilot programme on 1 March 2026 which will allow Australian applicants to designate the EPO as their International Searching and Preliminary Examining Authorities (ISA and IPEA). 

Given the EPO’s rigorous approach to clarity and support requirements, for this pilot programme to succeed, Australian applicants and patent practitioners will have to adapt to draft international applications with EPO-specific requirements in mind.

The launch of this pilot programme will add a new layer of complexity — (and opportunity) for patent practitioners. In a landscape where jurisdictional nuance can shape international search and examination outcomes, AI‑augmented tools such as Solve Intelligence's Patent CopilotTM are becoming increasingly valuable.

Joshua Davenport to join Solve’s Customer Advisory Board

We are excited to welcome Joshua Davenport, Shareholder at Banner Witcoff, to Solve Intelligence’s Customer Advisory Board.

Webinar: Masterclass – AI Prompt Engineering for Patent Workflows

As AI adoption in patent practice continues to accelerate, a critically important question emerges—How do you get AI to deliver the work product you need and the quality you want?

Please join Solve Intelligence and IPWatchdog on Thursday, February 5, at 12 PM ET for a detailed examination of the practical application of AI prompting for patent practice. This webinar is designed for patent attorneys and in-house counsel who want to move beyond experimentation and understand how prompt engineering can be used as a repeatable skill, enabling more efficient, higher-quality patent work across AI-enabled workflows.

Register here.

AI Assistance vs. Inventorship: Ethical Guidelines for Patent Attorneys

AI is now a daily tool for many patent attorneys; from drafting assistance to prior art searches. But questions about inventorship and ethics persist. Courts and patent offices worldwide continue to grapple with whether AI can be considered an inventor, and the recent November 2025 USPTO guidance has brought fresh clarity to this evolving area.

This article explores where the line is drawn between AI as a tool and AI as an inventor, and how attorneys can use AI responsibly while meeting their professional obligations.