Joshua Davenport to join Solve’s Customer Advisory Board

We are excited to welcome Joshua Davenport, Shareholder at Banner Witcoff, to Solve Intelligence’s Customer Advisory Board.

Joshua Davenport to join Solve’s Customer Advisory Board

Joshua represents clients across a wide range of intellectual property matters, including patent prosecution, litigation, and counseling. With a background in electrical engineering, he brings deep technical fluency to complex patent work spanning cutting-edge industries such as artificial intelligence, cellular networks, green energy, video games, finance infrastructure, carrier networking, and television broadcast systems.

Joshua’s practice is built around applying IP law to sophisticated technical issues, particularly in high-stakes disputes where clear strategy and technical precision matter most. He has also argued many cases before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) and has been recognized among the top filers of inter partes review petitions, reflecting extensive experience in post-grant practice.

In addition to his day-to-day client work, Joshua is an active voice in the evolving conversation around AI and legal practice, frequently speaking on developments in generative AI and how it impacts modern patent prosecution. This combination of real-world litigation and prosecution experience, paired with a forward-looking view of AI, makes him a fantastic fit for Solve’s mission to help IP professionals do their best work with AI-powered tools.

“Today’s AI solutions are most effective when leveraged as a tool for creating human workflows that weren’t previously possible. By understanding lawyers, not just technology, Solve is truly innovating on what the practice of law looks like, and I’m excited to collaborate with them in helping think through what’s next in our field.”
Joshua Davenport, Shareholder, Banner Witcoff
“Joshua’s mix of technical depth, PTAB experience, and practical insight into how AI is reshaping patent practice makes him an exceptional addition to our Customer Advisory Board. We’re excited to learn from his perspective as we continue building AI tools that improve the way patent professionals draft, prosecute, and manage high-value IP.”
Chris Parsonson, CEO & Co-founder, Solve Intelligence

We look forward to Joshua’s invaluable insights and contributions as Solve Intelligence continues to advance its AI-driven solutions for the IP community.

Check out the rest of our Customer Advisory Board here.

AI for patents.

Be 50%+ more productive. Join thousands of legal professionals around the World using Solve’s Patent Copilot™ for drafting, prosecution, invention harvesting, and more.

Related articles

How to Build an Invalidity Claim Chart: A Practical Guide

An invalidity claim chart is a structured document that maps, for example, each limitation of a patent claim against prior art to show the patent should never have been granted. If you’re defending against infringement allegations, preparing an IPR petition, opposing a European patent, or advising a client on patent risk, knowing how to build one correctly is non-negotiable.

Key takeaways

•       A well-built invalidity chart maps every claim limitation to prior art, element by element, with pinpoint citations to the exact column, line, page, or figure.

•       When IPRs reach a final written decision, the PTAB now finds every challenged claim unpatentable around 70% of the time; and the chart is a key component of getting a petition instituted in the first place.

•       Solve Intelligence’s Charts generates fully cited, limitation-by-limitation invalidity charts in minutes rather than days, flags weak limitation coverage candidly, and lets attorneys inspect the reasoning behind every mapping.

LAC 2026: What Generic and Biosimilar IP Teams Think About AI

Generic and biosimilar IP teams are already using AI for prosecution history and FTO work. The live debate is not about adoption, but internal framing of quality and coverage extension without reducing headcount. The teams furthest along chose the former.

Key takeaways

  • Generic and biosimilar IP teams use AI primarily for prosecution history summaries, invalidity analysis and FTO claim charting.
  • Viewing AI as a quality and coverage extension drives durable internal adoption.
  • General-purpose AI cannot reliably interpret claim scope from prosecution history; patent-specific tools are required.

Aliza Panjwani Joins Solve

We’re happy to welcome Aliza Panjwani as a Legal & Product Engineer.

Dan Rudoy to join Solve’s Customer Advisory Board

We are excited to welcome Dan Rudoy, Shareholder at Wolf Greenfield, to Solve Intelligence’s Customer Advisory Board.