Drafting for the EPO: How AI Can Make the New EPO–IP Australia PCT Pilot a Success

The EPO and IP Australia are launching a new PCT pilot programme on 1 March 2026 which will allow Australian applicants to designate the EPO as their International Searching and Preliminary Examining Authorities (ISA and IPEA). 

Given the EPO’s rigorous approach to clarity and support requirements, for this pilot programme to succeed, Australian applicants and patent practitioners will have to adapt to draft international applications with EPO-specific requirements in mind.

The launch of this pilot programme will add a new layer of complexity — (and opportunity) for patent practitioners. In a landscape where jurisdictional nuance can shape international search and examination outcomes, AI‑augmented tools such as Solve Intelligence's Patent CopilotTM are becoming increasingly valuable.

Drafting for the EPO: How AI Can Make the New EPO–IP Australia PCT Pilot a Success

Why the EPO–IP Australia PCT pilot matters

This pilot programme will expand options for Australian applicants by giving them access to thorough search reports and detailed written opinions from the EPO early in the international phase. 

The quality of drafting at the PCT stage has always had a direct impact on the usefulness of the international search report and strategic decisions that follow. With the launch of this pilot programme, the importance of high-quality drafting for Australian applicants will be emphasised.

Common challenges

Last autumn, Solve Intelligence wrote about the importance of drafting patents for local jurisdictions even when prosecution strategies are multi-jurisdictional in the article AI for Patents in Every Jurisdiction. The announcement of the EPO-IP Australia pilot programme highlights a slightly different perspective though: the importance of drafting patents for unfamiliar jurisdictions.

All patent practitioners know that drafting conventions that work well in one jurisdiction may create friction in another. This is exacerbated, particularly when applications are searched or examined by offices with strict clarity and support requirements such as the EPO. 

Common challenges include:

  • claim structure requirements 
  • claim dependency practices
  • disclosure standards

These challenges do not disappear during the international phase; rather, they will be amplified when the EPO conducts the international search and issues the written opinion.

How AI can help with patent drafting

AI is becoming an increasingly valuable drafting companion for patent practitioners. Used well, it can accelerate the early stages of application preparation, reduce time spent on repetitive drafting tasks, and help practitioners maintain consistency across claims and the specification.

Just as importantly, AI can act as a quality check. It can be used to surface potential clarity issues, ensure terminology is used consistently, and ensure a robust disclosure. In the context of international filings, this can lead to stronger applications in the international phase and fewer avoidable issues later in prosecution.

For Australian applicants and patent practitioners looking to succeed in the EPO–IP Australia PCT pilot programme, AI-augmented drafting tools could make all the difference.

How Solve’s Patent Copilot supports jurisdiction-specific drafting

Solve Intelligence's Patent Copilot is specifically designed to support jurisdiction-aware drafting from the start. Rather than merely offering generic drafting assistance, it incorporates office-specific conventions into its workflows to help practitioners draft high-quality patent applications tailored to the expectations of different patent offices.

Solve Intelligence's Patent Copilot employs jurisdiction-specific AI algorithms that form “region drafters”. Each region drafter is configured to reflect the requirements, conventions, and best practices of the relevant patent office. 

Practitioners can choose their target jurisdiction from one of two dropdown menus, which will load the appropriate region drafter for their target jurisdiction, and support their drafting for the chosen target jurisdiction. Additionally, users are also given the option to set the user interface and the AI output in their desired language.

Solve Intelligence Patent Drafting Copilot User Interface

For example, with the EPO-focused region drafter loaded, the underlying AI algorithm will ensure that the claims are drafted using the two-part form where necessary and with multiple dependencies, thus reducing the risk of formal objections in the written opinion and improving the support for claim amendments further down the line. Amongst others, Solve's Patent Copilot also has an IP Australia-focused region drafter, making it uniquely positioned to support patent professionals and applicants seeking patent protection in both regions.

Final thoughts

The EPO–IP Australia PCT pilot highlights the strategic value of high‑quality, jurisdiction‑aware PCT drafting. At Solve Intelligence, patent attorneys are working together with engineers to build products that achieve this, that patent professionals across the globe can use in their practice every day.

To learn more, get in touch with us to request a demo.

AI for patents.

Be 50%+ more productive. Join thousands of legal professionals around the World using Solve’s Patent Copilot™ for drafting, prosecution, invention harvesting, and more.

Related articles

How to Build an Invalidity Claim Chart: A Practical Guide

An invalidity claim chart is a structured document that maps, for example, each limitation of a patent claim against prior art to show the patent should never have been granted. If you’re defending against infringement allegations, preparing an IPR petition, opposing a European patent, or advising a client on patent risk, knowing how to build one correctly is non-negotiable.

Key takeaways

•       A well-built invalidity chart maps every claim limitation to prior art, element by element, with pinpoint citations to the exact column, line, page, or figure.

•       When IPRs reach a final written decision, the PTAB now finds every challenged claim unpatentable around 70% of the time; and the chart is a key component of getting a petition instituted in the first place.

•       Solve Intelligence’s Charts generates fully cited, limitation-by-limitation invalidity charts in minutes rather than days, flags weak limitation coverage candidly, and lets attorneys inspect the reasoning behind every mapping.

LAC 2026: What Generic and Biosimilar IP Teams Think About AI

Generic and biosimilar IP teams are already using AI for prosecution history and FTO work. The live debate is not about adoption, but internal framing of quality and coverage extension without reducing headcount. The teams furthest along chose the former.

Key takeaways

  • Generic and biosimilar IP teams use AI primarily for prosecution history summaries, invalidity analysis and FTO claim charting.
  • Viewing AI as a quality and coverage extension drives durable internal adoption.
  • General-purpose AI cannot reliably interpret claim scope from prosecution history; patent-specific tools are required.

Aliza Panjwani Joins Solve

We’re happy to welcome Aliza Panjwani as a Legal & Product Engineer.

Dan Rudoy to join Solve’s Customer Advisory Board

We are excited to welcome Dan Rudoy, Shareholder at Wolf Greenfield, to Solve Intelligence’s Customer Advisory Board.