Drafting for the EPO: How AI Can Make the New EPO–IP Australia PCT Pilot a Success

The EPO and IP Australia are launching a new PCT pilot programme on 1 March 2026 which will allow Australian applicants to designate the EPO as their International Searching and Preliminary Examining Authorities (ISA and IPEA). 

Given the EPO’s rigorous approach to clarity and support requirements, for this pilot programme to succeed, Australian applicants and patent practitioners will have to adapt to draft international applications with EPO-specific requirements in mind.

The launch of this pilot programme will add a new layer of complexity — (and opportunity) for patent practitioners. In a landscape where jurisdictional nuance can shape international search and examination outcomes, AI‑augmented tools such as Solve Intelligence's Patent CopilotTM are becoming increasingly valuable.

Drafting for the EPO: How AI Can Make the New EPO–IP Australia PCT Pilot a Success

Why the EPO–IP Australia PCT pilot matters

This pilot programme will expand options for Australian applicants by giving them access to thorough search reports and detailed written opinions from the EPO early in the international phase. 

The quality of drafting at the PCT stage has always had a direct impact on the usefulness of the international search report and strategic decisions that follow. With the launch of this pilot programme, the importance of high-quality drafting for Australian applicants will be emphasised.

Common challenges

Last autumn, Solve Intelligence wrote about the importance of drafting patents for local jurisdictions even when prosecution strategies are multi-jurisdictional in the article AI for Patents in Every Jurisdiction. The announcement of the EPO-IP Australia pilot programme highlights a slightly different perspective though: the importance of drafting patents for unfamiliar jurisdictions.

All patent practitioners know that drafting conventions that work well in one jurisdiction may create friction in another. This is exacerbated, particularly when applications are searched or examined by offices with strict clarity and support requirements such as the EPO. 

Common challenges include:

  • claim structure requirements 
  • claim dependency practices
  • disclosure standards

These challenges do not disappear during the international phase; rather, they will be amplified when the EPO conducts the international search and issues the written opinion.

How AI can help with patent drafting

AI is becoming an increasingly valuable drafting companion for patent practitioners. Used well, it can accelerate the early stages of application preparation, reduce time spent on repetitive drafting tasks, and help practitioners maintain consistency across claims and the specification.

Just as importantly, AI can act as a quality check. It can be used to surface potential clarity issues, ensure terminology is used consistently, and ensure a robust disclosure. In the context of international filings, this can lead to stronger applications in the international phase and fewer avoidable issues later in prosecution.

For Australian applicants and patent practitioners looking to succeed in the EPO–IP Australia PCT pilot programme, AI-augmented drafting tools could make all the difference.

How Solve’s Patent Copilot supports jurisdiction-specific drafting

Solve Intelligence's Patent Copilot is specifically designed to support jurisdiction-aware drafting from the start. Rather than merely offering generic drafting assistance, it incorporates office-specific conventions into its workflows to help practitioners draft high-quality patent applications tailored to the expectations of different patent offices.

Solve Intelligence's Patent Copilot employs jurisdiction-specific AI algorithms that form “region drafters”. Each region drafter is configured to reflect the requirements, conventions, and best practices of the relevant patent office. 

Practitioners can choose their target jurisdiction from one of two dropdown menus, which will load the appropriate region drafter for their target jurisdiction, and support their drafting for the chosen target jurisdiction. Additionally, users are also given the option to set the user interface and the AI output in their desired language.

Solve Intelligence Patent Drafting Copilot User Interface

For example, with the EPO-focused region drafter loaded, the underlying AI algorithm will ensure that the claims are drafted using the two-part form where necessary and with multiple dependencies, thus reducing the risk of formal objections in the written opinion and improving the support for claim amendments further down the line. Amongst others, Solve's Patent Copilot also has an IP Australia-focused region drafter, making it uniquely positioned to support patent professionals and applicants seeking patent protection in both regions.

Final thoughts

The EPO–IP Australia PCT pilot highlights the strategic value of high‑quality, jurisdiction‑aware PCT drafting. At Solve Intelligence, patent attorneys are working together with engineers to build products that achieve this, that patent professionals across the globe can use in their practice every day.

To learn more, get in touch with us to request a demo.

AI for patents.

Be 50%+ more productive. Join thousands of legal professionals around the World using Solve’s Patent Copilot™ for drafting, prosecution, invention harvesting, and more.

Related articles

The Hidden Cost of Ignoring AI in Patent Practice

As patent practitioners, the choice to “do nothing” about AI is not a neutral act. 

Law firms or in-house counsel that delay the adoption of AI may believe they are minimizing risk, but oftentimes they are taking on a different set of less visible, long-term risks. 

These hidden costs can accumulate quickly, from compounding inefficiencies in traditional patent drafting workflows to missed revenue opportunities that remain untapped without leveraging AI-driven capabilities.

So, what can patent practitioners do to stay ahead of the game? Here is what the Solve Intelligence team has seen speaking with thousands of practitioners.

Key takeaways

  • Waiting to adopt AI is itself a strategic decision with compounding costs.
  • Manual patent workflows create time, quality, and knowledge bottlenecks that grow over time.
  • Firms already experimenting with AI gain operational insight that late adopters cannot shortcut.
  • Low-risk entry points let practitioners build confidence without compromising legal judgment.

Why Patent Attorneys Need Purpose-Built AI

Legal AI platforms like Harvey and Legora are valuable productivity tools. Powered by large language models and enriched with legal data sources, firm-specific knowledge, and purpose-built workflows, they perform well on tasks like legal research, document summarisation, and contract or email drafting.

But their workflows are optimised for breadth across practice areas, not for the structural, technical, and jurisdictional depth that patent work requires.

For IP teams that already have access to a generalist platform, or are trying one out, the natural follow-up question is whether a vertical solution adds enough to justify the investment. 

At Solve Intelligence, we build AI specifically for patent practitioners. In our experience scaling the platform to over 500 IP teams, there is no question that patent-specific tooling delivers ROI that generalist platforms alone cannot. This article sets out why.

Key takeaways

  • Generalist legal AI tools weren't trained for the structural depth patent work demands.
  • Solve Intelligence is shaped by in-house patent attorneys who joined Solve from firms like Carpmaels & Ransford and Fish & Richardson.
  • Custom templating lets attorneys match output to house style, client/technology area, or jurisdiction.
  • Generalist and patent-specific AI are complementary investments, not competing ones.

Marbury Law sees 3x-4x efficiency gain from using Solve Intelligence

When we sat down with Bob Hansen for this conversation, we knew it would be grounded in both legal depth and real-world business experience. Bob is a founding partner of The Marbury Law Group and has extensive experience across patent prosecution, litigation, licensing, portfolio strategy, and complex IP transactions. But what makes his perspective particularly compelling is that he also brings 20 years of real-world experience as an engineer, program manager, and business executive in Fortune 50 companies and start-ups. He understands firsthand how innovation moves from idea to product, and how intellectual property law fits into that journey.

That dual lens is exactly why we wanted to have this discussion. Bob evaluates technology not just as a patent attorney, but as someone who has managed engineering teams, navigated acquisitions and divestitures, raised capital, and built businesses. When someone with that background says AI has been transformative and backs it up with measurable 3 to 4x efficiency gains, it’s worth listening.

Key Insights

  • AI adoption requires proof. Bob and his team tested multiple tools before committing, and only moved forward once they saw quantifiable results.
  • 3 to 4x efficiency gains changed the business case. By tracking his own drafting time, Bob demonstrated that AI-enabled workflows made fixed-fee work viable at partner rates.
  • Demonstration drives adoption. Live drafting sessions, client transparency, and side-by-side cost comparisons created full buy-in from both clients and colleagues.
  • Integrated chat removes friction. Keeping research, drafting, and revisions inside one contextual workspace eliminated copy-paste workflows and saved significant time.
  • Context is a force multiplier. AI performs best when it understands the full invention disclosure, file history, and drafting materials in one place.
  • Speed expands strategic value. Faster drafting didn’t just save time - it enabled better coverage, stronger enablement, and real-time responsiveness to client needs.

About Marbury Law

The Marbury Law Group is a premier mid-size, full-service intellectual property and technology law firm in the Washington, D.C. area, with additional strength in commercial law, litigation, and trademark litigation. Recognized by Juristat as a top 35 law firm nationwide and holding Martindale-Hubbell’s AV® Preeminent™ Peer Review Rating, Marbury serves clients ranging from Fortune 500 companies and mid-size technology businesses to high-tech startups and inventors. Its practitioners bring unusually wide-ranging experience, including former technology executives, government R&D managers, startup founders, in-house counsel, “big-law” attorneys, USPTO patent examiners, and judicial clerks. 

Marbury delivers “big-law” service with the flexibility and personal attention of a smaller firm, pairing high-quality work with efficient, budget-aware billing. Based near the USPTO, the firm has drafted and prosecuted thousands of U.S. and foreign patent applications and trademarks, and advises on IP strategy, diligence, and licensing. Formed in 2009 through the merger of two established practices (with roots dating back to 1994), the firm takes its name from Marbury v. Madison (1803), the landmark Supreme Court case that established judicial review.

Introducing Solve Review: A Practical Guide to AI-Powered Patent Review

Patent drafting doesn’t end when the first draft is complete. In many ways, the most important work begins at review.

Jurisdictional compliance, internal style alignment, claim clarity, sufficiency of disclosure, and formal requirements. Each aspect of drafting applications must be carefully checked before filing. Yet a thorough review is time-intensive, difficult to standardize, and hard to scale across teams and large portfolios, especially when up against a tight deadline.

Enter Solve Review

With Solve Review, practitioners can run structured, customizable AI-powered reviews in minutes rather than hours, while maintaining transparency, collaboration, and full control over the output. 

Teams using Solve Review report dramatically, with multi-pass manual reviews that previously took three to four hours completing in a fraction of the time

Key benefits

  • AI-powered patent reviews in minutes
  • Each review is fully customizable
  • Save your reviews as templates, run multiple reviews per application
  • Full transparency of working out and results
  • Resolve issues detected by Solve Review with AI