Webinar: Masterclass – AI Prompt Engineering for Patent Workflows

As AI adoption in patent practice continues to accelerate, a critically important question emerges—How do you get AI to deliver the work product you need and the quality you want?

Please join Solve Intelligence and IPWatchdog on Thursday, February 5, at 12 PM ET for a detailed examination of the practical application of AI prompting for patent practice. This webinar is designed for patent attorneys and in-house counsel who want to move beyond experimentation and understand how prompt engineering can be used as a repeatable skill, enabling more efficient, higher-quality patent work across AI-enabled workflows.

Webinar: Masterclass – AI Prompt Engineering for Patent Workflows

Solve Intelligence CEO Chris Parsonson, General Counsel & U.S. Patent Attorney Justin Doop, and Partner at Faegre Drinker Johnathon Webb, will focus on how sophisticated prompts are written in practice to support high-value tasks such as customizing claims, drafting specifications, performing structured review, responding to Office Actions, and generating and iterating on claim charts.

Chris and Justin will begin with a concise overview of what industry research teaches about effective prompting, including context-setting, constraints, structured outputs, and iterative review. They will then provide examples showing how prompt design directly impacts efficiency, quality, and practitioner control over the output. Finally, they will demonstrate those principles live through attorney-led examples inside Solve Intelligence.

AI for patents.

Be 50%+ more productive. Join thousands of legal professionals around the World using Solve’s Patent Copilot™ for drafting, prosecution, invention harvesting, and more.

Request Demo

How to Build an Invalidity Claim Chart: A Practical Guide

An invalidity claim chart is a structured document that maps, for example, each limitation of a patent claim against prior art to show the patent should never have been granted. If you’re defending against infringement allegations, preparing an IPR petition, opposing a European patent, or advising a client on patent risk, knowing how to build one correctly is non-negotiable.

Key takeaways

• A well-built invalidity chart maps every claim limitation to prior art, element by element, with pinpoint citations to the exact column, line, page, or figure.

• When IPRs reach a final written decision, the PTAB now finds every challenged claim unpatentable around 70% of the time; and the chart is a key component of getting a petition instituted in the first place.

• Solve Intelligence’s Charts generates fully cited, limitation-by-limitation invalidity charts in minutes rather than days, flags weak limitation coverage candidly, and lets attorneys inspect the reasoning behind every mapping.

Read Now

LAC 2026: What Generic and Biosimilar IP Teams Think About AI

Generic and biosimilar IP teams are already using AI for prosecution history and FTO work. The live debate is not about adoption, but internal framing of quality and coverage extension without reducing headcount. The teams furthest along chose the former.

Key takeaways

Generic and biosimilar IP teams use AI primarily for prosecution history summaries, invalidity analysis and FTO claim charting.
Viewing AI as a quality and coverage extension drives durable internal adoption.
General-purpose AI cannot reliably interpret claim scope from prosecution history; patent-specific tools are required.

Read Now