Announcing Solve Intelligence's Customer Advisory Board

We are excited to announce the formation of our Customer Advisory Board, bringing together distinguished intellectual property practitioners who are at the forefront of the patent space to help advise Solve on building the go-to AI platform for IP professionals.

Announcing Solve Intelligence's Customer Advisory Board

Close collaboration with IP practitioners has always been a founding principle of Solve, and as artificial intelligence continues to transform the practice of patent law, we believe this close collaboration will become increasingly vital. The formation of the Customer Advisory Board represents our commitment to building solutions that not only leverage cutting-edge technology but also address the practical challenges patent attorneys face in daily practice.

Coming from leading law firms, corporate IP departments, and boutique practices, the CAB’s collective expertise spans multiple technological domains—from life sciences to software, and from telecommunications to mechanical engineering—and multiple jurisdictions. Their collective expertise and experience will be invaluable in providing strategic guidance on feature and product development, workflow optimization, and insight on our customer’s evolving and changing needs. By working closely with experienced practitioners, we can better anticipate the challenges faced during patent drafting and prosecution, ensuring our software remains an indispensable tool for IP professionals, inventors, and the entire intellectual property community.

We are honored to work with this accomplished group of IP practitioners and look forward to the insights and perspectives they will bring to Solve Intelligence as we continue to build our platform to serve the entire intellectual property community.

AI for patents.

Be 50%+ more productive. Join thousands of legal professionals around the World using Solve’s Patent Copilot™ for drafting, prosecution, invention harvesting, and more.

Related articles

AI Claim Charting - Patent Prosecution

Patent prosecution has always hinged on precision, speed, and strategic foresight. Yet as Office Actions grow in both volume and complexity—often bundling multiple §§102 (novelty) and 103 (obviousness) rejections grounded in nuanced claim interpretations and an ever-expanding body of prior art—the traditional toolkit of the patent professional faces serious challenges. Manual claim charting, painstaking annotation of cited references, and labor‑intensive crafting of responses under tight deadlines can create bottlenecks, drive up costs, and leave room for human error.

Enter AI-powered claim charting: a suite of advanced natural language processing (NLP), machine‑learning (ML), and knowledge‑representation technologies that is rapidly reinventing each step of the Office Action workflow. By automating the generation of claim charts, surfacing hidden flaws in Examiner rejections, semantically analyzing claim language, and even proposing targeted response strategies, AI tools are transforming how attorneys and agents prosecute patents.

In this post, we’ll explore four core capabilities of AI‑driven claim charting and how they bring both speed and insight to Office Action responses:

  1. Automated analysis of Examiner rejections
  2. Instant flagging of issues and gaps
  3. Holistic assessment of claim language and prior art
  4. AI‑generated response strategies

The 5 Best Patent Proofreading Software Solutions for Law Firms (2025)

Key Takeaways

  • Proofreading software has become essential: Manual checks can’t keep pace with growing patent complexity and filing volumes. AI solutions can help prevent costly errors, office actions, and post-grant risks.

  • Most legacy solutions fall short of quality control: Many platforms rely on basic rule-based checks, lack real-time drafting integration, and offer limited jurisdictional support, creating workflow gaps and added manual work.
  • Solve Intelligence for AI-assisted patent review: With seamless drafting integration, tracked changes, auto-propagation of edits, and multi-jurisdiction compliance, Solve Intelligence provides unmatched accuracy and efficiency.

G 1/24 Decision: EPO Clarifies Claim Interpretation

The Enlarged Board of Appeal issued its decision in case G 1/24 on 18 June 2025, concluding that "The description and drawings shall always be consulted to interpret the claims when assessing the patentability of an invention under Articles 52 to 57 EPC, and not only if the person skilled in the art finds a claim to be unclear or ambiguous when read in isolation."

Prior Art Search: 7 AI Tools Ranked for Patent Professionals

Discover 7 top AI tools for smarter prior art search, ranked and reviewed for patent professionals seeking innovation and accuracy