Announcing Solve Intelligence's Customer Advisory Board

We are excited to announce the formation of our Customer Advisory Board, bringing together distinguished intellectual property practitioners who are at the forefront of the patent space to help advise Solve on building the go-to AI platform for IP professionals.

Announcing Solve Intelligence's Customer Advisory Board

Close collaboration with IP practitioners has always been a founding principle of Solve, and as artificial intelligence continues to transform the practice of patent law, we believe this close collaboration will become increasingly vital. The formation of the Customer Advisory Board represents our commitment to building solutions that not only leverage cutting-edge technology but also address the practical challenges patent attorneys face in daily practice.

Coming from leading law firms, corporate IP departments, and boutique practices, the CAB’s collective expertise spans multiple technological domains—from life sciences to software, and from telecommunications to mechanical engineering—and multiple jurisdictions. Their collective expertise and experience will be invaluable in providing strategic guidance on feature and product development, workflow optimization, and insight on our customer’s evolving and changing needs. By working closely with experienced practitioners, we can better anticipate the challenges faced during patent drafting and prosecution, ensuring our software remains an indispensable tool for IP professionals, inventors, and the entire intellectual property community.

We are honored to work with this accomplished group of IP practitioners and look forward to the insights and perspectives they will bring to Solve Intelligence as we continue to build our platform to serve the entire intellectual property community.

AI for patents.

Be 50%+ more productive. Join thousands of legal professionals around the World using Solve’s Patent Copilot™ for drafting, prosecution, invention harvesting, and more.

Related articles

What Is a Freedom to Operate Analysis, and How Does AI Speed It Up?

A freedom to operate (FTO) analysis is a claim-by-claim assessment of whether a commercial activity would infringe any third-party patents in the markets where it will take place. AI speeds it up by handling the parts that scale badly by hand: surfacing relevant patents, mapping product features against claims element by element, pulling legal status by jurisdiction, and producing a cited, structured draft for the attorney to review and refine.

Key takeaways

•     FTO analysis determines whether a product infringes third-party patents.

•     A valid patent on your own invention doesn’t guarantee freedom to operate.

•     Purpose-built AI patent tools deliver around 60 to 90 percent efficiency gains on structured FTO tasks.

•     Generalist AI and purpose-built patent tools share a surface format; but FTO reliability depends on integration, not interface.

How to Build an Invalidity Claim Chart: A Practical Guide

An invalidity claim chart is a structured document that maps, for example, each limitation of a patent claim against prior art to show the patent should never have been granted. If you’re defending against infringement allegations, preparing an IPR petition, opposing a European patent, or advising a client on patent risk, knowing how to build one correctly is non-negotiable.

Key takeaways

•       A well-built invalidity chart maps every claim limitation to prior art, element by element, with pinpoint citations to the exact column, line, page, or figure.

•       When IPRs reach a final written decision, the PTAB now finds every challenged claim unpatentable around 70% of the time; and the chart is a key component of getting a petition instituted in the first place.

•       Solve Intelligence’s Charts generates fully cited, limitation-by-limitation invalidity charts in minutes rather than days, flags weak limitation coverage candidly, and lets attorneys inspect the reasoning behind every mapping.

LAC 2026: What Generic and Biosimilar IP Teams Think About AI

Generic and biosimilar IP teams are already using AI for prosecution history and FTO work. The live debate is not about adoption, but internal framing of quality and coverage extension without reducing headcount. The teams furthest along chose the former.

Key takeaways

  • Generic and biosimilar IP teams use AI primarily for prosecution history summaries, invalidity analysis and FTO claim charting.
  • Viewing AI as a quality and coverage extension drives durable internal adoption.
  • General-purpose AI cannot reliably interpret claim scope from prosecution history; patent-specific tools are required.

Aliza Panjwani Joins Solve

We’re happy to welcome Aliza Panjwani as a Legal & Product Engineer.