Introducing Solve Review: A Practical Guide to AI-Powered Patent Review

Patent drafting doesn’t end when the first draft is complete. In many ways, the most important work begins at review.

Jurisdictional compliance, internal style alignment, claim clarity, sufficiency of disclosure, and formal requirements. Each aspect of drafting applications must be carefully checked before filing. Yet a thorough review is time-intensive, difficult to standardize, and hard to scale across teams and large portfolios, especially when up against a tight deadline.

Enter Solve Review

With Solve Review, practitioners can run structured, customizable AI-powered reviews in minutes rather than hours, while maintaining transparency, collaboration, and full control over the output. 

Teams using Solve Review report dramatically, with multi-pass manual reviews that previously took three to four hours completing in a fraction of the time

Key benefits

  • AI-powered patent reviews in minutes
  • Each review is fully customizable
  • Save your reviews as templates, run multiple reviews per application
  • Full transparency of working out and results
  • Resolve issues detected by Solve Review with AI
Introducing Solve Review: A Practical Guide to AI-Powered Patent Review

Why patent review is difficult to scale

High-quality patent review requires legal judgment, technical understanding, and procedural and commercial awareness. But several structural challenges make it difficult to perform consistently and efficiently.

Jurisdictional complexity 

Patent applications must comply with detailed and evolving legal frameworks such as the MPEP in the United States or the EPO Guidelines in Europe. Requirements differ across jurisdictions, making manual review increasingly complex for filings destined for global coverage. Even experienced practitioners must actively cross-reference guidance to ensure compliance.

Inconsistent internal standards 

Firms and in-house teams often maintain internal drafting conventions, including preferred terminology, claim formats, structural templates, and stylistic rules. However, these standards are rarely embedded directly into review systems. As a result, consistency and quality depends heavily on individual reviewers.

Collaboration friction 

Applications frequently move between inventors, in-house counsel, and outside firms. Each stakeholder may apply slightly different review criteria. Aligning expectations can slow down the filing process.

Training and knowledge transfer 

Junior practitioners must learn both formal legal requirements and firm-specific drafting practices. Without structured feedback systems, training can be inconsistent and difficult to scale. This also increases senior attorney time spent on training and reviewing junior work product.

Volume pressure 

Modern patent portfolios can include hundreds or thousands of filings across multiple jurisdictions. Manual review of every application at the same level of rigor is economically challenging.

How Solve Review builds structured review workflows

We built Solve Review to address these challenges and bring structure, repeatability, and intelligence to the patent review process. Here’s how it works in practice:

Step 1: Configure your review

Solve Review allows you to define exactly what you want the AI to assess. Reviews can be customized by technical field, jurisdiction (e.g., US, EP), practice group style, and internal drafting rules. Custom instructions can be saved to your Instructions Library, allowing reuse across future projects.

Step 2: Integrate reviews into templates

Review configurations can be embedded directly into drafting templates. This means that every application created from a template automatically inherits your preferred review configuration. Teams can share templates internally, and collaborate on templates between outside and in house counsel, ensuring that quality control begins at the drafting stage rather than after the fact.

Step 3: Run legal and compliance reviews

Solve Review assesses applications against jurisdictional frameworks including the MPEP and the EPO Guidelines. Rather than requiring practitioners to manually cross-reference these documents, the AI automatically pulls in the relevant legal guidance and cites specific provisions as part of its review.

As guidelines evolve, Solve Intelligence ensures reviews stay current without requiring manual updates to your workflow. This review of the draft also ensures compliance with the chosen template, a powerful way to confirm adherence to client guidelines and firm preferences.

Step 4: Mark up and resolve issues

When issues are identified, Solve can insert comments directly into the document, suggest resolutions in tracked changes, and enable iterative refinement through Chat. Practitioners remain fully in control: reviewing, editing, or rejecting suggestions as needed. 

In practice, teams report resolving the majority of flagged issues in a single review pass, compared to two or three rounds of back-and-forth under manual workflows.

Step 5: Review any document

Solve Review is not limited to documents drafted within Solve. You can upload any patent application, including Word drafts, and run the same structured review workflows against it. This allows firms and in-house teams to standardize review processes regardless of where drafting occurred.

What are the advantages of AI-driven patent review?

Potentially another product image or branded infographic that reflects the below

Standardization at scale

By saving review instructions and embedding them into templates, firms can ensure that consistent standards are applied across offices, teams, and jurisdictions.

Faster turnaround

What previously required multiple manual review passes can now be completed in a fraction of the time, freeing senior practitioners to focus on substantive strategy rather than checklist verification.

Improved transparency

Review criteria are explicit and configurable. Teams can see exactly what is being assessed and refine instructions over time.

Better collaboration

Shared templates and review configurations align expectations between in-house teams and outside counsel, reducing back-and-forth and accelerating filing.

Training support

Structured AI feedback provides junior practitioners with clear, repeatable guidance aligned with firm and jurisdictional standards.

Getting Started With Solve Review

Patent review is too important to shortcut and, until now, performing it rigorously on every application was impractical at portfolio scale. Solve Review changes that. With structured, jurisdiction-aware AI review built directly into the drafting workflow, teams can apply the same rigorous quality standard to every filing, whether they handle fifty applications a year or five hundred. 

To see Solve Review in action, request a demo or contact our team at partnerships@solveintelligence.com.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Can Solve Review be used on documents not drafted within the Solve system?

A: Yes, the tool is not limited to documents drafted within Solve; you can upload any patent application, including Word drafts, and run the same structured review workflows against it.

Q: Is the Solve Review module an additional cost?

A: This new feature is included with your existing Solve subscription. It's a complimentary upgrade designed to enhance the value you already receive. 

Q: How does Solve Review stay updated with changes to jurisdictional guidelines (e.g., MPEP, EPO Guidelines)?

A: As legal and procedural guidelines evolve, we update the underlying knowledge base, meaning your reviews automatically reflect the latest requirements without manual updates to your firm's workflow.

AI for patents.

Be 50%+ more productive. Join thousands of legal professionals around the world using Solve’s Patent Copilot™ for drafting, prosecution, invention harvesting, and more.

Related articles

Automated Patent Proofreading: QA Framework for §112

The final review before a U.S. patent filing should not be another linear read-through. Rather, it should be a controlled quality-assurance step: a systematic check of the relationships among the claims, specification, and drawings while the full range of corrective options is still available.

Done well, pre-filing QA catches errors that are inexpensive to fix at the drafting desk but costly after filing. Done poorly, it can leave the applicant facing an avoidable rejection, a narrowing amendment, a priority problem, or a validity challenge years later.

Key Takeaways:

  • Pre-filing is the best time to correct disclosure, claim, and drawing defects without creating new-matter or priority complications.
  • Antecedent basis gaps, contradictory claim dependencies, and terminology drift are the most common pre-filing defects, and all are correctable before filing.
  • Section 112(a) review is substantive, not clerical: a broad range or functional limitation may warrant scrutiny even when the claim reads cleanly.
  • Automated patent proofreading identifies candidate defects for attorney review but does not substitute for legal judgment on claim scope, support, or strategy.

Solve Intelligence × iManage: Solve’s Patent Workflows and AI agents seamlessly integrated with your Firm’s Intelligence

Patent attorneys can now directly connect with iManage into Solve Intelligence’s platform, further streamlining your patent workflows.

The best patent applications are built from deep context. Claim sets that hold up, specifications that anticipate rejections and objections, arguments that resonate with examiners and legal and IP decisions that align with business and client needs. All of this depends on the attorney having the right materials at the right time. That's why we integrated Solve Intelligence directly with iManage.

iManage is where IP practices and firm intelligence lives. It's the document management platform trusted by thousands of legal organizations globally, where client disclosures land, where prosecution histories are stored, where the institutional knowledge of a firm accumulates over years. Now, that knowledge is directly accessible inside Solve.

How to Draft Patent Figures with Solve Intelligence

Solve’s Figure Builder is the integrated environment within the Solve platform where you can generate, edit, label and refine figures. It brings figures into the drafting process, alongside claim and specification drafting so consistency, and compliance with 37 CFR §1.84, is maintained across your application from the very first sketch to the version you file.

Key Takeaways:

  • Create, edit and finalize figures for your patent filings, both manually and with AI assistance.
  • Bring figure management into the heart of the drafting process to ensure you have the figures you need, when you need them.
  • Propagate changes in terminology and reference numerals across your whole application with ease.
  • Convert disclosure documents or claims into labelled line drawings in a single session, and then use them as the basis for your detailed description.

Bree Vculek Joins Solve

We're delighted to welcome Bree Vculek to Solve Intelligence as our newest Legal and Product Engineer.