Sughrue Mion Integrates Solve Intelligence into Patent Practice

Sughrue Mion has always set the standard for what patent prosecution looks like. Founded in 1957, the firm has obtained more U.S. patents than any other law firm in the world. That record is built on deep technical expertise, disciplined prosecution strategy, and a culture that takes the quality of every work product seriously.

When Sughrue decided to integrate AI into patent workflows for select clients, their approach reflected that culture. Sughrue thoughtfully structured its implementation, and demonstrated a clear vision of where technology and AI adds value and where attorney judgment remains irreplaceable.

Key Insights

  • Sughrue adopted Solve Intelligence's platform for certain clients across Drafting, Prosecution, and Charts following firm-wide testing, culminating in an enterprise partnership.
  • The rollout was driven by Firm leadership prioritising practitioner education and a structured implementation framework from day one.
  • Solve Intelligence is now integrated into numerous preparation and prosecution workflows, helping Sughrue's attorneys work faster, think more expansively, and deliver higher-quality outcomes for a global client base.
Sughrue Mion Integrates Solve Intelligence into Patent Practice

About Sughrue Mion

From its founding in 1957 to today, Sughrue Mion has maintained an exclusive focus on intellectual property law. That focus has produced a remarkable track record for the firm. In addition to having assisted their clients in obtaining more U.S. patents than any other law firm in the world, Sughrue has litigated IP disputes in every major forum, including U.S. District Courts nationwide, the USITC, PTAB, and TTAB. 

The firm is also genuinely international. With major clients across Japan, Korea, China, Taiwan, Europe, the United States and more, Sughrue operates as a true global IP partner. 

Sughrue, over its lifetime, has attracted talent from all subject-matter areas to provide substantive coverage across virtually any technology domain. The team’s collective experience spans IPR, PGR, covered business method proceedings, reexamination, reissue, and interference, grounded in decades of both prosecution and inter partes practice before the USPTO.

The bar at Sughrue is high. A technically demanding docket, complex cross-border filings, and a quality standard the firm has maintained for nearly 70 years meant that any AI platform under consideration had to demonstrate it could match that level.

Efficient Testing, Clear Decision Making

Before committing to an enterprise subscription, Sughrue put Solve Intelligence through weeks of intensive testing across the firm, head-to-head against other vendors. Practitioners with domestic U.S. prosecution experience and those handling complex international filings both participated, stress-testing Solve’s platform.

The evaluation covered the technology areas that define Sughrue's practice: semiconductor design, pharmaceutical, chemical, cellular and network technologies, software, automotive systems, and more. Attorneys assessed how well the platform handled the technical precision required in claim language, how useful the office action analysis was in practice, and whether the outputs were genuinely improving the quality of the work or just adding noise.

The results were clear enough to justify an enterprise-wide commitment.

“Solve has allowed our attorneys to reduce time spent on routine aspects of patent drafting, prosecution, and analyses, and focus more on higher level strategic analysis.  It allows us to give our clients more thorough, robust, and thoughtful representation for their global patent portfolios,” explained John Rabena, Sughrue’s Managing Partner.

Solve Intelligence in Action

Sughrue's attorneys are now using Solve Intelligence across many of their core workflows.

Response Formulation: The platform summarises examiner rejections, identifies the key grounds of rejection, and surfaces potential counterarguments and prosecution avenues for attorney review. For a firm handling Sughrue's volume and complexity of prosecution work, this significantly compresses the time from receiving an office action to having a structured, attorney-refined response strategy in hand.

Prior Art Analysis: Solve Intelligence provides fast, thorough analysis of cited references, helping practitioners quickly evaluate the strength of examiner positions and identify the most defensible paths to allowance. Given the breadth of Sughrue's technology docket, the platform's ability to engage substantively across diverse technical fields is a true differentiator.

Global Prosecution Workflows: Reflecting Sughrue’s global IP leadership, Solve Intelligence is integrated with local legal texts across the US, Europe, and Asia-Pacific, helping attorneys achieve the same quality of outcomes for their clients across all jurisdictions. From a US appeal brief, to a Japanese office action, practitioners are able to draft work products that meet Sughrue’s exceptional standards.       

Application Drafting Support: Solve Intelligence assists in generating detailed specification language aligned with proposed claims and supporting documentation, helping to ensure proper specification support and consistent terminology across complex applications. This gives attorneys more time to focus on the claim-shaping and strategic decisions where their expertise matters most.

Technology That Keeps the Attorney in Control

Sughrue's integration of Solve Intelligence is not about replacing what makes the firm exceptional. The attorneys at Sughrue have graduate-level scientific training, decades of prosecution experience, and a proven track record of securing some of the world's most consequential patents. What Solve Intelligence does is free those attorneys from the more mechanical aspects of prosecution work, so they can invest their expertise where it has the greatest impact, such as crafting prosecution strategy, anticipating post-grant challenges, advising clients on portfolio positioning, and navigating the realities of multi-jurisdictional filing.

For a firm that has spent nearly 70 years defining what excellent IP practice looks like, that is exactly the right use of AI.

AI for patents.

Be 50%+ more productive. Join thousands of legal professionals around the world using Solve’s Patent Copilot™ for drafting, prosecution, invention harvesting, and more.

Related articles

Page White Farrer Adopts Solve Intelligence for AI-Assisted Patent Drafting

Page White Farrer Adopts Solve Intelligence and Solve's AI Templates

Page White Farrer ("PWF"), a specialist intellectual property firm with a longstanding focus on technology-driven innovation, has selected Solve Intelligence to support patent application drafting following an extensive evaluation of available AI tools. The firm has initially deployed the platform within its technology-focused patent teams, supporting work across sectors such as AI, software, telecommunications, electronics, semiconductors and engineering. 

The firm's objective was not to automate legal judgement or replace attorney expertise, but to accelerate the preparation of high-quality first drafts of patent applications. By combining AI-assisted drafting with custom templates tailored to the firm's preferred drafting approaches, Solve Intelligence helps attorneys move from an initial claim set to a reviewable first draft more efficiently while maintaining consistency and technical accuracy. 

For this partnership, PWF's primary focus was on configuring the platform around the firm's own drafting conventions, client preferences and established best practices, ensuring that the technology supports the way its attorneys already work. 

The Honest Risks of Using AI in Patent Prosecution

AI is changing how patent prosecution gets done, and the upside is real. So are the downsides: hallucinated citations, confidentiality exposure, export-control pitfalls, and prosecution-history estoppel. This is an honest account of the risks of AI patent software in prosecution, and what actually reduces each one.

Key takeaways

  • Anyone presenting AI-assisted content to the USPTO must reasonably review it; relying on the tool's accuracy alone is not enough.
  • Courts have already sanctioned attorneys for AI-hallucinated citations, and similar risk applies to office-action responses and PTAB briefs.
  • The USPTO warns that AI tools on foreign servers can raise export-control, foreign-filing-license, and national-security problems.
  • Grounded citations, exposed reasoning, zero data retention, and attorney oversight are what materially reduce AI risk in patent prosecution.

Maiwald Chooses Solve Intelligence for Selected AI-Supported IP Workflows

Solve Intelligence is proud to share that Maiwald, one of Germany’s largest and most progressive intellectual property firms, works with Solve Intelligence on selected AI-supported workflows in its patent and legal practice groups. Following an evaluation period during which selected functionalities were assessed for approved internal use cases, Maiwald and Solve have formed an enterprise partnership for 2026.

The rollout reflects the same careful approach Maiwald brings to its client work. Solve enables customers in Europe to process data on servers located within Europe and holds recognized information-security certifications. In addition, Solve offers contractual commitments designed to protect confidential professional information in line with applicable statutory confidentiality obligations and professional conduct requirements. Against that background, any use of AI-supported tools took place only within approved governance structures and under applicable professional, contractual, confidentiality and data-protection requirements.

That balance of innovation and professional judgment is characteristic of Maiwald. The firm has spent decades setting a standard for IP work in Europe: rigorous prosecution, a formidable contentious practice, and interdisciplinary teams of patent attorneys and attorneys-at-law working side by side. The firm approached AI the same way, methodically, with a clear sense of where it adds leverage and where an experienced attorney’s judgment remains irreplaceable. 

PTAB Case Studies of AI Disclosure Requirements: Part II

This article is the second of a series of Patent Trial & Appeal Board (PTAB) case studies (see Part I), which aims to inform applicants’ approach to satisfying the written description and enablement requirements for patenting artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning technologies.