Using Generative AI Tools to Prepare USPTO Submissions

The integration of generative AI into the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) submission processes is reshaping the landscape of patent and trademark filings. This article provides an overview of all prior guidance from the USPTO on the use of AI and explores the multifaceted role of AI tools in enhancing efficiency, ensuring compliance, and navigating the complex legal and ethical landscapes of patent applications. From drafting patent applications to managing confidentiality and security, legal practitioners must adapt to maintain accuracy, inventorship integrity, and ethical standards in their submissions. Given the numerous practical applications and their benefits, generative AI is becoming an indispensable asset in legal practices, especially in interactions with the USPTO systems.

Using Generative AI Tools to Prepare USPTO Submissions

Generative AI and Its Relevance to USPTO Submissions

The USPTO published guidance on the use of AI in the Federal Registrar, including inventorship guidance for AI-assisted inventions and guidance on the use of AI-based tools in practice before the USPTO, which have touched on the following topics: 

1.    Inventorship in AI Patent Applications

The USPTO artificial intelligence guidance clearly states that AI cannot be recognized as an inventor. If AI assists, however, in the invention process, the current guidance states that significant human contribution (under the Pannu factors) is required for patentability. Additionally, the USPTO has requested comments from the public in connection with this topic in a notice, and several public comments have urged the USPTO to take a broader pathway to patentability

2.    Confidentiality and Security in AI Usage

According to the USPTO guidance on AI tools, practitioners must ensure that AI tools adhere to stringent confidentiality and security standards. This includes compliance with the USPTO foreign filing license requirements, ensuring data is secure from unauthorized export, and addressing national security and export control considerations.

3.    Reviewing AI-Generated Content for AI Patents

The USPTO guidance on AI tools suggests careful review of AI-generated content before submission for accuracy and completeness. 

4.    Ethical Considerations and Duty of Candor with AI Tools

The USPTO emphasizes a strict duty of candor and good faith when using AI tools in legal practices. This includes independently verifying AI-generated information and ensuring that all submissions are free of material misstatements or omissions.

5.    Use of AI in Interacting with USPTO Systems

AI systems are not recognized as users of the USPTO’s electronic systems. The USPTO guidance on AI tools specifies that practitioners must comply with all regulatory obligations, including those concerning direct human oversight of submissions made using AI.

Practical Applications of Generative AI in USPTO Submissions

The integration of generative AI into the patent application process presents numerous practical applications that can significantly enhance efficiency, accuracy, and innovation. One of the primary applications of generative AI is in the initial drafting of patent applications. AI tools can assist inventors and patent attorneys by automatically generating detailed descriptions of inventions based on initial inputs. This can include the creation of technical descriptions, claims, and abstracts, which are tailored to comply with patent office requirements. By automating this initial drafting process, generative AI can save time and reduce the workload on human experts, allowing them to focus on more complex and strategic aspects of patent filing.

Furthermore, generative AI can be utilized to perform prior art searches with a high degree of efficiency. AI algorithms can analyze vast databases of existing patents, scientific journals, and other technical documents to identify patentable aspects of a new invention. This capability not only speeds up the patentability review process but also enhances the thoroughness of these searches, potentially increasing the likelihood of identifying new and creative patentable aspects that might otherwise be overlooked. This can help in assessing the novelty of an invention more accurately, which is a critical factor in the patent granting process.

Another significant application of generative AI in patents is in the analysis of patent claims. AI systems can be trained to understand and interpret patent language, which can then be used to suggest modifications to strengthen the scope of patent claims or to identify potential vulnerabilities in a patent application. This can aid patent professionals in crafting robust claims that are better positioned to withstand legal scrutiny and potential challenges.

Generative AI can also assist in predicting patent prosecution and litigation risks by analyzing trends and patterns in existing USPTO art units and patent litigations. AI models can process historical data to identify characteristics of patents that frequently face disputes or are prone to challenges. This predictive capability can guide inventors and companies in strategic decision-making regarding patent applications and portfolio management, potentially reducing future legal disputes and strengthening IP positions.

In summary, the practical applications of generative AI in the patent application process are transformative. From streamlining the drafting of applications to enhancing the precision of patentability reviews and strengthening patent claims, AI technologies offer a suite of tools that can improve the quality, efficiency, and strategic management of patents. As these technologies continue to evolve, their integration into the patent landscape is likely to expand, offering even more sophisticated tools for inventors, attorneys, and patent offices worldwide.

Benefits of Using Generative AI in Patent Preparation

Artificial Intelligence is revolutionizing the legal and patent industries, bringing with it a multitude of benefits that are being embraced by legal professionals, patent drafters, and in-house teams globally. The overarching impact of AI in these fields primarily centers around significant efficiency gains, which are being reported by many users who have integrated AI into their workflows.

One of the most pronounced benefits of AI is the improvement in efficiency, especially evident in the drafting of patent applications, creation and analysis of drawings, and reviewing of patent applications. This not only saves considerable time but also maintains the quality of output. Despite the pressures of cost and time constraints, AI ensures that the output remains consistent and of high quality, tailored to meet individual preferences. This reliability in maintaining high standards is critical in a field where precision is paramount.

Moreover, AI's ability to streamline processes allows legal professionals to shift their focus towards more strategic aspects of their work. For instance, they can allocate more time to providing value-added strategic advice and making impactful decisions. This includes spending more time analyzing and developing higher quality claims, which in turn enhances the service delivered to clients with faster response times. As a result, legal teams can handle an increased number of clients and cases, further amplifying their throughput and operational bandwidth.

Another significant advantage is the faster turnaround in the analysis and enhancement of disclosures, leading to quicker responses from outside counsel. This rapid processing capability of AI tools helps in strategic intellectual property management, enabling recipients to receive superior strategic advice on IP portfolio development. It also allows them to align this advice more effectively with their business objectives, optimizing the return on investment from their IP assets due to this focused strategic insight.

AI also stimulates prolific innovation by aiding in the generation of more comprehensive patent applications and invention disclosures. This not only improves the quality of submissions but also frees up valuable time for inventors to dedicate to research and development, rather than spending excessive time interacting with attorneys or filling out lengthy disclosure forms. Consequently, this reduces the barriers to patenting, simplifying the process and reducing the back-and-forth communication typically required between inventors, in-house teams, and outside counsel.

Ultimately, the integration of AI into the legal and patent drafting workflows provides a competitive edge. It frees up time for IP teams and outside counsel, allowing them to offer more strategic, tailored patenting advice that aligns closely with specific business objectives. This transformation brought about by AI not only enhances operational efficiencies but also elevates the strategic capabilities of legal teams, positioning themas more proactive and impactful in their roles.

Here, at Solve Intelligence, we are building the first AI-powered platform to assist with every aspect of the patenting process, including our Patent Copilot™, which assists with patent drafting, and future technology focused on patent filing, patent prosecution and office action analysis, patent portfolio strategy and management, and patent infringement analyses. At each stage, however, our Patent Copilot™ works with the patent professional and we have designed our products to keep patent professionals in the driving seat, thereby equipping legal professionals, law firms, companies, and inventors with the tools to help develop the full scope of protection for their inventions.

AI for patents.

Be 50%+ more productive. Join thousands of legal professionals around the World using Solve’s Patent Copilot™ for drafting, prosecution, invention harvesting, and more.

Related articles

The Hidden Cost of Ignoring AI in Patent Practice

As patent practitioners, the choice to “do nothing” about AI is not a neutral act. 

Law firms or in-house counsel that delay the adoption of AI may believe they are minimizing risk, but oftentimes they are taking on a different set of less visible, long-term risks. 

These hidden costs can accumulate quickly, from compounding inefficiencies in traditional patent drafting workflows to missed revenue opportunities that remain untapped without leveraging AI-driven capabilities.

So, what can patent practitioners do to stay ahead of the game? Here is what the Solve Intelligence team has seen speaking with thousands of practitioners.

Key takeaways

  • Waiting to adopt AI is itself a strategic decision with compounding costs.
  • Manual patent workflows create time, quality, and knowledge bottlenecks that grow over time.
  • Firms already experimenting with AI gain operational insight that late adopters cannot shortcut.
  • Low-risk entry points let practitioners build confidence without compromising legal judgment.

Why Patent Attorneys Need Purpose-Built AI

Legal AI platforms like Harvey and Legora are valuable productivity tools. Powered by large language models and enriched with legal data sources, firm-specific knowledge, and purpose-built workflows, they perform well on tasks like legal research, document summarisation, and contract or email drafting.

But their workflows are optimised for breadth across practice areas, not for the structural, technical, and jurisdictional depth that patent work requires.

For IP teams that already have access to a generalist platform, or are trying one out, the natural follow-up question is whether a vertical solution adds enough to justify the investment. 

At Solve Intelligence, we build AI specifically for patent practitioners. In our experience scaling the platform to over 500 IP teams, there is no question that patent-specific tooling delivers ROI that generalist platforms alone cannot. This article sets out why.

Key takeaways

  • Generalist legal AI tools weren't trained for the structural depth patent work demands.
  • Solve Intelligence is shaped by in-house patent attorneys who joined Solve from firms like Carpmaels & Ransford and Fish & Richardson.
  • Custom templating lets attorneys match output to house style, client/technology area, or jurisdiction.
  • Generalist and patent-specific AI are complementary investments, not competing ones.

Marbury Law sees 3x-4x efficiency gain from using Solve Intelligence

When we sat down with Bob Hansen for this conversation, we knew it would be grounded in both legal depth and real-world business experience. Bob is a founding partner of The Marbury Law Group and has extensive experience across patent prosecution, litigation, licensing, portfolio strategy, and complex IP transactions. But what makes his perspective particularly compelling is that he also brings 20 years of real-world experience as an engineer, program manager, and business executive in Fortune 50 companies and start-ups. He understands firsthand how innovation moves from idea to product, and how intellectual property law fits into that journey.

That dual lens is exactly why we wanted to have this discussion. Bob evaluates technology not just as a patent attorney, but as someone who has managed engineering teams, navigated acquisitions and divestitures, raised capital, and built businesses. When someone with that background says AI has been transformative and backs it up with measurable 3 to 4x efficiency gains, it’s worth listening.

Key Insights

  • AI adoption requires proof. Bob and his team tested multiple tools before committing, and only moved forward once they saw quantifiable results.
  • 3 to 4x efficiency gains changed the business case. By tracking his own drafting time, Bob demonstrated that AI-enabled workflows made fixed-fee work viable at partner rates.
  • Demonstration drives adoption. Live drafting sessions, client transparency, and side-by-side cost comparisons created full buy-in from both clients and colleagues.
  • Integrated chat removes friction. Keeping research, drafting, and revisions inside one contextual workspace eliminated copy-paste workflows and saved significant time.
  • Context is a force multiplier. AI performs best when it understands the full invention disclosure, file history, and drafting materials in one place.
  • Speed expands strategic value. Faster drafting didn’t just save time - it enabled better coverage, stronger enablement, and real-time responsiveness to client needs.

About Marbury Law

The Marbury Law Group is a premier mid-size, full-service intellectual property and technology law firm in the Washington, D.C. area, with additional strength in commercial law, litigation, and trademark litigation. Recognized by Juristat as a top 35 law firm nationwide and holding Martindale-Hubbell’s AV® Preeminent™ Peer Review Rating, Marbury serves clients ranging from Fortune 500 companies and mid-size technology businesses to high-tech startups and inventors. Its practitioners bring unusually wide-ranging experience, including former technology executives, government R&D managers, startup founders, in-house counsel, “big-law” attorneys, USPTO patent examiners, and judicial clerks. 

Marbury delivers “big-law” service with the flexibility and personal attention of a smaller firm, pairing high-quality work with efficient, budget-aware billing. Based near the USPTO, the firm has drafted and prosecuted thousands of U.S. and foreign patent applications and trademarks, and advises on IP strategy, diligence, and licensing. Formed in 2009 through the merger of two established practices (with roots dating back to 1994), the firm takes its name from Marbury v. Madison (1803), the landmark Supreme Court case that established judicial review.

Introducing Solve Review: A Practical Guide to AI-Powered Patent Review

Patent drafting doesn’t end when the first draft is complete. In many ways, the most important work begins at review.

Jurisdictional compliance, internal style alignment, claim clarity, sufficiency of disclosure, and formal requirements. Each aspect of drafting applications must be carefully checked before filing. Yet a thorough review is time-intensive, difficult to standardize, and hard to scale across teams and large portfolios, especially when up against a tight deadline.

Enter Solve Review

With Solve Review, practitioners can run structured, customizable AI-powered reviews in minutes rather than hours, while maintaining transparency, collaboration, and full control over the output. 

Teams using Solve Review report dramatically, with multi-pass manual reviews that previously took three to four hours completing in a fraction of the time

Key benefits

  • AI-powered patent reviews in minutes
  • Each review is fully customizable
  • Save your reviews as templates, run multiple reviews per application
  • Full transparency of working out and results
  • Resolve issues detected by Solve Review with AI