How Scale LLP Increases Patent Drafting Efficiency by 40-60%

Boosting patent drafting efficiency by 40-60%, Scale LLP uses Solve Intelligence Patent Copilot™ to enhance quality, streamline workflows, and more.

How Scale LLP Increases Patent Drafting Efficiency by 40-60%

Alexander Slafkosky, Counsel at Scale LLP, reports how using Solve Intelligence’s Patent Copilot™ has led to 40-60% efficiency improvements in his patent drafting workflows.

‘​​I have been using Solve Intelligence to help draft patent applications, and I find it incredibly powerful and definitely the future of patent drafting.’ - Alexander Slafkosky, Scale LLP
‘I have nothing but great things to say about Solve’s Patent Copilot. I have used it for about a half dozen patent applications, and with each successive project my final deliverable gets even better. As I gain more experience with Solve's AI, I find that I can spend more time focusing on what needs to be said (e.g., solid background, alternative embodiments, correct scoping) rather than how to get words onto paper. My work has become more strategic and analytical and less wheel-spinning, which ultimately leads to better patent applications. And Solve's non-stop improvements based on attorney feedback - both to usability and functionality - are amazing.’ - Brian Detwiler, Scale LLP

Challenge

Scale LLP, a forward-thinking law firm based in Silicon Valley, faced the challenge of optimizing their patent drafting process. Traditionally, many parts of the process were time consuming and cumbersome. They needed a solution that not only accelerated drafting but also enhanced the quality of the patents they draft and the service they provide clients.

Solution

By adopting Solve Intelligence Patent Copilot™, Alex has ‘changed how he practices patent law’.

Alex now starts with a single robust independent claim. Next, he uploads the disclosure materials (video call transcripts, technical materials, rough notes, etc.). Then, Alex uses Patent Copilot™ to draft 20-40 dependent claims before cutting down and asking the AI to add to any soft spots identified. Alex will then use Patent Copilot™ to iteratively build out the specification, using the AI to draft technical benefits and alternative options. Finally, Alex uses Patent Copilot™ to draft the ‘necessary but boring’ parts such as the summary, EP styles, etc.

Results

Using the above process with Patent Copilot™, Alex has yielded 40-60% efficiency gains in his workflows.

In three recent provisional applications:

  • For Client 1, the AI contributed to 38% of the word count for substantive specification and benefits sections.
  • For Client 2, the AI's contribution was 42% of the word count, with a notable 30% in the benefits section alone.
  • Client 3 saw the AI's contribution reach 61% of the word count, with over a quarter in claims and a third in benefits.

These figures translate into tangible benefits for Scale LLP and its clients:

  1. More efficient use of budget, allowing for higher quality patents or more patents per budget.
  2. Elimination of monotonous parts of the patent drafting workflow.
  3. Overcoming the initial challenge of drafting from scratch.

By leveraging AI, Scale LLP has not just increased efficiency but also improved the quality of its patent applications, ensuring that clients receive the strongest possible intellectual property protection and service from their outside counsel.

AI for patents.

Be 50%+ more productive. Join thousands of legal professionals around the World using Solve’s Patent Copilot™ for drafting, prosecution, invention harvesting, and more.

Related articles

Level Up Your IP Strategy - Senior IP & Patent Leaders, see AI in action.

Solve Intelligence will be presenting a live product demo at the upcoming private workshop hosted by HG Law and organised by Cosmonauts.

📅 Wednesday, 4 March 2026:

Workshop: 2:30 PM - 6:00 PM | COMO Metropolitan London Hotel, London, UK

Dinner: 6:00 PM - 9:00 PM | COYA Mayfair, London, UK

This session is designed for Heads of IP, Patent Directors, and innovation leaders who want to level up their IP strategy by seeing AI applied in patent drafting, preparation, and prosecution.

Register Here.

How to Talk to Clients About Using AI in Patent Drafting

Artificial intelligence is no longer a theoretical issue in patent drafting, and many firms are already using AI-assisted workflows in some form. The harder question now isn’t whether to use AI, but how to talk to clients about using it.

Key insights

  • Focus on better drafting quality, enforceability, and fewer avoidable downstream problems.
  • Walk through data handling so confidentiality and retention protections are easy to trust.
  • Explain inventorship stays human and the attorney remains responsible for every word.
  • Keep the process clear and documented so expectations stay aligned from day one.

For some clients, AI usage signals efficiency and modernisation. For others, it raises immediate concerns about confidentiality, inventorship, and quality control. Those concerns are legitimate, so the key is to approach conversations about AI in a way that is structured, transparent, and grounded in professional responsibility.

In practice, the most effective discussions with clients will focus on outcomes rather than technology.

This article provides a structured framework to use when talking to clients about using AI, such as Solve Intelligence’s Patent Drafting CopilotTM, in patent drafting.

How to use AI in patent practice: USPTO guidance and compliance tips

As Artificial Intelligence (AI) and large language models (LLMs) increasingly integrate into legal practices, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) issued guidance to assist patent attorneys with adopting AI tools in patent drafting, prosecution, and other areas of patent law.

In this article, we summarize the key compliance requirements from the USPTO's guidance and explain how Patent Copilot™ helps practitioners meet these obligations while leveraging AI's benefits.

UK Supreme Court aligns UK software patentability with EPO approach

The UK Supreme Court’s Emotional Perception decision moves UK practice closer to the EPO for computer implemented inventions, including AI. Claims with ordinary hardware will usually avoid the “computer program as such” exclusion, but only technical features can support inventive step. In practice, applicants should focus arguments and evidence on technical contribution and inventive step.

Key takeaways

  1. UK moves closer to EPO, inventive step becomes the main battleground.
  2. Ordinary hardware avoids exclusion, but may not support inventiveness.
  3. Only technical features count at inventive step, not business aims.
  4. Neural networks are treated as software, no special treatment either way.
  5. Draft around technical contribution, measurable effects, and system level impact.