Engineering Excellence: How Haynes Boone is Evaluating Enhancements to Patent Practice with Solve Intelligence

We are proud to announce that HaynesBoone is working closely with Solve Intelligence following a rigorous evaluation process.

Engineering Excellence: How Haynes Boone is Evaluating Enhancements to Patent Practice with Solve Intelligence

About HaynesBoone

Haynes Boone is an Am Law 100 law firm with a reputation for excellence that spans over 50 years. With nearly 800lawyers across 20 offices worldwide, the firm is a powerhouse in energy, technology, and financial services.

Haynes Boone has built one of the most formidable intellectual property practices in the country. Consistently ranked among the top firms for patent prosecution and a recognized leader in PTAB trials, IP litigation, and other disputes, their IP team develops and manages the critical intangible assets and product clearances of Fortune 500 companies and dynamic innovators alike.

Behind this scale is a culture of collaboration and a commitment to efficiency: a shift from traditional silos to integrated, technology-driven workflows that empower attorneys to deliver greater value to clients.

That same transformation is now helping refine how Haynes Boone’s patent prosecution practice operates.

Partnership

Haynes Boone’s practice is continuing to evolve to help deliver excellent results for our clients, through their evaluation of and partnering with Solve Intelligence to help improve the current generation of available tools.

A broad testing program brought together prosecutors and technical experts from across the firm, ensuring that critical feedback is being provided to Solve and included in future development to meet the rigorous standards of a top-tier global firm.

Below are two key use cases where Solve might be useful to support client needs:

●     Patent Application Drafting: Solve assists in generating detailed language for analysis and use in patent specifications, e.g., based on proposed claims and related supporting documentation, which helps ensure consistent terminology and reduces the time required to produce a high-quality first draft for patent practitioner review and further drafting.

●     Office Action Response: Solve summarizes examiners’ rejections, identifies key rejection grounds, and suggests counter-arguments for patent prosecutor analysis and drafting, streamlining the response process for complex prosecution matters.

Solve’s flexibility has made it a catalyst for digital transformation across patent prosecution practices likeHaynes Boone’s—matching the firm’s global reach with next-generation legal intelligence.

Impact

By automating a portion of the labor-intensive aspects of drafting, attorneys can now spend more time editing and improving U.S. PTO submissions, complex legal strategy, portfolio management, and partnering with clients.

The result is a prosecution function that operates with the same rigor and efficiency as the industries they serve:precise, data-driven, and forward-looking.

For Haynes Boone, the transformation is about more than productivity—it’s about positioning the firm as a pioneer in the AI era to best support their valued clients.

As Haynes Boone continues to grow its global footprint, its team stands as a model for what’s next: a smart, connected law firm that scales precision, insight, and impact.

AI for patents.

Be 50%+ more productive. Join thousands of legal professionals around the World using Solve’s Patent Copilot™ for drafting, prosecution, invention harvesting, and more.

Related articles

Validating AI Output in Patent Practice: Solve Intelligence at ABA-IPL 2026

The American Bar Association’s Intellectual Property Law Section Spring Conference (ABA-IPL) remains one of the premier annual gatherings for IP professionals, bringing together practitioners, in-house counsel, academics, and policymakers to explore the latest developments shaping the field. 

Solve Intelligence was invited not only to attend, but to share their expertise on the concluding panel as leaders in AI.

Sughrue Mion Integrates Solve Intelligence into Patent Practice

Sughrue Mion has always set the standard for what patent prosecution looks like. Founded in 1957, the firm has obtained more U.S. patents than any other law firm in the world. That record is built on deep technical expertise, disciplined prosecution strategy, and a culture that takes the quality of every work product seriously.

When Sughrue decided to integrate AI into patent workflows for select clients, their approach reflected that culture. Sughrue thoughtfully structured its implementation, and demonstrated a clear vision of where technology and AI adds value and where attorney judgment remains irreplaceable.

Key Insights

  • Sughrue adopted Solve Intelligence's platform for certain clients across Drafting, Prosecution, and Charts following firm-wide testing, culminating in an enterprise partnership.
  • The rollout was driven by Firm leadership prioritising practitioner education and a structured implementation framework from day one.
  • Solve Intelligence is now integrated into numerous preparation and prosecution workflows, helping Sughrue's attorneys work faster, think more expansively, and deliver higher-quality outcomes for a global client base.

Solve Intelligence, Powered by Claude

At Solve Intelligence, we believe the future of intellectual property belongs to professionals who can combine deep legal expertise with the most capable AI available. That's why our platform is powered by Claude, and why we're expanding what's possible for patent professionals and inventors worldwide.

The Speed-Quality Trade-Off in UPC Provisional Measures

Preliminary injunctions, or “provisional measures” in Unified Patent Court (UPC) terminology, have become the most consequential procedural tool in European patent litigation. In under three years, the UPC has issued 63 decisions across 88 cases, with filings accelerating year on year. The analytical rigour courts demand has increased at precisely the moment timelines have compressed.

For patent teams on both sides, the procedural reality is stark: court-ready claim analysis that once took months must now be produced in days, at a depth that no longer rewards manual workflows.

Tools like Solve Intelligence’s Charts are emerging as a response to that structural pressure, compressing the mechanical phases of claim charting while preserving the practitioner-led judgment that courts expect.