Dan Rudoy to join Solve’s Customer Advisory Board

We are excited to welcome Dan Rudoy, Shareholder at Wolf Greenfield, to Solve Intelligence’s Customer Advisory Board.

Dan Rudoy to join Solve’s Customer Advisory Board

Dan chairs Wolf Greenfield’s Electrical & Computer Technologies Practice and sits on the firm’s Executive Committee, where he has practiced for more than 15 years. His practice focuses on IP counseling, patent portfolio development, and patent prosecution for clients working across a broad range of technologies. A significant and growing part of that work centers on artificial intelligence and machine learning, including model architectures, agentic systems, and new algorithms. He is especially active in “tech bio” work at the intersection of software and life sciences, including bioinformatics and the computational workflows behind drug discovery, diagnostics, and digital health. His work also covers enterprise software, including databases, algorithms, and cybersecurity, and extends to electronics, radar, and medical device technologies.

Dan brings a rare combination of technical and legal credentials to this work. He holds a PhD in Electrical Engineering from Harvard University and a JD, summa cum laude, from Suffolk University Law School, alongside degrees in mathematics and computer science from the University of Pennsylvania. Earlier in his career, he conducted engineering research at MIT Lincoln Laboratory, giving him a working engineer’s understanding of the inventions he now helps protect.

His practice spans the full IP lifecycle. Dan works regularly with start-ups, mid-size and multinational companies, non-profit organizations, and investors, advising on IP strategy and portfolio development in the United States and abroad, and on matters well beyond prosecution, including due diligence, trade secrets, technology and IP agreements, open-source, and freedom to operate.

Within Wolf Greenfield, Dan leads much of the firm’s work integrating AI into its day-to-day practice, across both the legal and operational sides of the business, and he drives a broader effort around AI-enabled practice innovation. He is an active voice on how AI is reshaping patent practice. He is also a frequent speaker and author on how to patent AI inventions, and on the eligibility and disclosure challenges they raise. That mix of deep technical fluency, full-lifecycle prosecution experience, and a forward-looking view of AI makes him an excellent fit for Solve’s Customer Advisory Board.

As Solve Intelligence continues to build AI tools that modernize and accelerate how IP teams work across the entire patent lifecycle, Dan’s perspective as a technically grounded practitioner and practice leader will be a valuable addition to our mission.

“AI is fundamentally changing how lawyers, and patent practitioners in particular, work day to day, and it is one of the most exciting shifts the profession has seen in a long time. Solve understands that patent prosecution is high-stakes, judgment-driven work, and builds tools that augment practitioners rather than replace their expertise. That’s exactly why I’m joining its Customer Advisory Board, where I look forward to contributing a technical and practice-leadership perspective as Solve raises the bar for legal AI.”

Dan Rudoy, Shareholder, Wolf Greenfield

“Dan brings a great depth of technical expertise in AI and machine learning, paired with years of front-line prosecution experience and unique insight into how the patent profession is adapting to AI. His insight into what excellent patent work requires, from invention through portfolio strategy, will be invaluable as we continue building tools that help practitioners draft, prosecute, and manage high-value IP. We’re delighted to welcome Dan to our Customer Advisory Board.”

Chris Parsonson, CEO & Co-founder, Solve Intelligence

We look forward to Dan’s insights and contributions as Solve Intelligence continues to advance AI-driven solutions for the entire patent workflow.

Check out the rest of our Customer Advisory Board here.

AI for patents.

Be 50%+ more productive. Join thousands of legal professionals around the World using Solve’s Patent Copilot™ for drafting, prosecution, invention harvesting, and more.

Related articles

EPO G 1/26: How the Coated Steel Strips Case Tests Article 123(2)

At Solve Intelligence, we build AI tools purpose-built for patent prosecution and opposition workflows. European teams, including cross-Atlantic firms like HG, use Solve Intelligence to stay ahead of EPO doctrine shifts as they happen. In this article, we cover the three referred questions in G 1/26, the practical implications for prosecution and opposition teams, and what to do before the decision lands.

Key takeaways

  • G 1/26 asks whether G 1/24's rule to consult the description extends from patentability assessment to Article 123(2) added matter.
  • The underlying case (T 873/24) turns on whether "ratio of titanium to nitrogen in excess of 3.42" means a weight ratio or a molar ratio.
  • The referral poses three sets of questions: admissibility under Article 112(1), the reach of the description in claim interpretation, and the consequences for Article 123(2).
  • If the Enlarged Board extends G 1/24 to Article 123(2), description-based narrowing applies to added-matter assessment across all European proceedings.

Built for IP: How Banner Witcoff Is Raising the Bar on Patent Work with Solve Intelligence

"We viewed our choice of AI platform as significant to the future of our patent practice. After extensively evaluating many products, we concluded that Solve Intelligence best met the needs of our attorneys and our clients." Laura Brutman, Shareholder, Banner Witcoff

Patents and Standards 2026: When SEP portfolios outgrow human review

The 8th UCL Patents and Standards conference brought together all the key standard essential patent (SEP) players on both the holder and implementer sides. 

By the end of day two, one technical question kept resurfacing across panels that were nominally discussing other topics. How does anyone actually assess essentiality and validity at the scale modern declared portfolios now reach? At Solve Intelligence, this is the question we have built our platform to answer.

Key takeaways

  • At today's portfolio scales, AI is a precondition for SEP essentiality and validity assessment, not an enhancement of human review.
  • Streaming standards are fully in SEP territory, bringing implementers with no licensing history into the same mapping problems as in cellular standards.
  • SEP disputes default to parallel multi-jurisdiction proceedings, requiring position alignment across every forum before the first filing.

Why Patent Practice Needs Purpose-Built AI: Reflections from Code with Claude

Anthropic's Code with Claude convened the global community of developers, founders, and researchers building applied AI on Claude. Solve Intelligence was invited to speak from the stage on what we have learned building AI for patent professionals, and the conference was a useful reminder of why domain-specific software matters in high-stakes legal work.