UK Supreme Court grants permission for Emotional Perception Appeal

The UK Supreme Court has granted permission for Emotional Perception AI to appeal the decision of the Court of Appeal of 19 July 2024, in the latest chapter in this potentially pivotal case addressing the patentability of computer-implemented inventions, specifically those involving artificial neural networks (ANNs).

UK Supreme Court grants permission for Emotional Perception Appeal

A Journey through the Courts

At the heart of this case is a patent application to an Artificial Neural Network (ANN)-powered music recommendation system. Emotional Perception AI initially succeeded at the High Court, which found the invention fell outside the exclusion for computer programs ‘as such’. This initial decision caused quite the stir, as it was in stark contrast to how AI-related inventions were previously dealt with in the UK. The UKIPO even issued Statutory Guidance a week later which indicated that ANNs should be dealt with differently (and arguably more favourably) when assessing patentability issues.

The Court of Appeal, however, disagreed. It concluded that the invention was caught by the exclusion and reaffirmed that ANNs, like other computer-implemented inventions, must demonstrate a sufficient ‘technical’ contribution to escape it. The decision of the Court of Appeal effectively reset the issue to business as usual - whereby ANNs are considered no differently or more favourably than any other computer-implemented invention.

What’s Next?

With permission to appeal granted, this case will now come before the UK’s highest court. The involvement of the Supreme Court illustrates the potential significance of this case, and provides an opportunity to revisit the complex and often-debated boundaries of patentable subject matter in the UK. More specifically, we may get a final answer on some of the key points of contention surrounding this case, such as:

  • Whether the application of ANNs is inherently technical;
  • What may be deemed a 'technical contribution' in the realm of AI; and
  • How to interpret the exclusions to patentability in light of new and evolving technology areas such as AI.

Broader Implications

If the Supreme Court upholds the Court of Appeal’s ruling, it will confirm the long-standing application of the law by the UKIPO - ANNs, like other software innovations, must provide a technical contribution that falls outside a computer program ‘as such’. However, a decision in favor of Emotional Perception AI could mark a shift, potentially making the UK a more favorable jurisdiction for AI-related inventions than the EPO.

For these reasons, the progress of this case at the Supreme Court will be closely watched by patent professionals and innovators alike. Whether the Court will reinforce the current legal framework or open the door to further technologies remains to be seen.

AI for patents.

Be 50%+ more productive. Join thousands of legal professionals around the world using Solve’s Patent Copilot™ for drafting, prosecution, invention harvesting, and more.

Related articles

What FICPI's ABC Meeting 2026 Revealed About AI-Ready Patent Practice

Solve Intelligence participated as a sponsor of FICPI’s ABC Meeting 2026 in Nashville, with CEO and Co-founder Chris Parsonson, demonstrating the practical application of a purpose-built patent AI platform. Patent attorneys and litigators convened for a key session addressing a central question: what is required for AI to be ready for patent practice? 

Key Takeaways:

  • Solve Intelligence supports the full patent lifecycle across 700+ IP firms, from invention disclosure through litigation.
  • One firm that adopted Solve Intelligence mid-fiscal year exceeded its billing targets by $1 million by reallocating AI-saved time to higher-value work.
  • In-house teams now require outside counsel to use AI tools, making AI fluency a firm selection criterion rather than a differentiator.
  • Attorneys report that ROI is not simply about increasing speed, but about reallocating the time saved to higher-value strategies, cross-sell analysis, and client insights.

How Solve Intelligence Expands the Offerings of Small Patent Firms

Solve Intelligence cuts the time attorneys spend on patent work by half. This lets a solo practitioner or small patent firm widen their offering without widening headcount. Work that a small practice once had to outsource can now be brought in-house, including creating patent drawings and prior art searching. The results are faster turnaround and higher margins for small firms. These time savings also free up capacity to offer ancillary services like landscaping, freedom-to-operate analysis, and infringement detection, work that was historically hard to do for small firms because of the manual effort involved.

Key Takeaways:

  • AI lets small firms bring outsourced work back in-house, including patent drawings and prior art search, improving margins and shortening turnaround.
  • AI makes patent attorneys more productive, freeing capacity for landscaping, FTO, and infringement detection work.
  • Patent work is structurally complex, so purpose-built patent AI, not a general chatbot, is what delivers reliable output.

Hansson Thyresson Integrates Solve Intelligence into Patent Practice​

Founded in Malmö over three decades ago, Hansson Thyresson has built its reputation on close client relationships paired with deep technical and legal expertise. When the firm decided to integrate AI into its practice, it looked for a platform that could deliver enterprise-grade capability.

They chose Solve Intelligence.

Key Takeaways:

  • Hansson Thyresson has adopted Solve Intelligence for patent application drafting, bringing enterprise-grade AI into the firm's workflows.
  • The firm pairs Solve Intelligence with its hands-on, attorney-led service model, keeping practitioners in control of every output.
  • For Hansson Thyresson, Solve Intelligence amplifies attorney expertise, improving work quality and focus on strategic work that matters most to clients.

Bringing LexisNexis® Global Patent Litigation Data into Solve Intelligence Workflows

Solve Intelligence has teamed up with LexisNexis® Intellectual Property Solutions to bring global patent litigation insights into Solve Intelligence workflows for patent drafting, prosecution, claim charting, freedom-to-operate assessments, invalidity analysis, and related IP work.