Patent Attorneys at Solve Intelligence: Building AI for Patent Practice

At Solve Intelligence, we build AI tools for patent attorneys. This means a design philosophy of developing, testing and refining our platforms specifically with our end-users in mind. We recognize that in order to build the best AI tools for patent attorneys, patent attorneys themselves must be involved in the development process. Their domain expertise, combined with the advanced technical knowledge of our AI and engineering teams, ensures our Patent Copilot isn’t just innovative—it’s tailored to the realities of patent practice, delivering solutions that truly work for attorneys. In this article, we explain what our patent attorneys do here at Solve, and how they collaborate with our wider team and customers to deliver our AI solutions.

Patent Attorneys at Solve Intelligence: Building AI for Patent Practice

Product Development

Our IP team at Solve includes patent attorneys with multi-jurisdictional experience and diverse technical backgrounds. The team plays a pivotal role in shaping our Patent Copilot. From ideation to implementation, their expertise is central to our development process. Here’s how they contribute:

Defining the Problem Space: Our patent attorneys identify the most time-consuming and error-prone tasks in drafting and prosecution, such as claim construction, incorporating edits to lengthy specifications, and prior art analysis.

Collaborating on Feature Design: Our attorneys work closely with our AI and engineering teams to design features that simplify these tasks. For instance, our Patent Drafting Copilot’s functionality was developed with direct input from attorneys in our team who understand the intricacies of patent drafting, and how this can differ for chemical compositions and computer-implemented inventions, for example.

Rigorous Testing: Once features are implemented, our patent attorneys rigorously test them in real-world scenarios and provide critical feedback to fine-tune performance.

Customer Success: Our IP team is uniquely positioned to quickly understand and address customer feedback, even if such feedback stems from a relatively niche area of patent law. Our attorneys are able to leverage their legal expertise to implement custom solutions and new features within our platforms based on customer feedback, with the help of the wider team here at Solve.

Beyond their role in product development, our IP team manages our own intellectual property portfolio - including drafting and prosecuting our own patent applications. This work gives our attorneys first-hand experience of our Patent Copilot, and with it, the opportunity to provide further feedback for the development process.

Collaboration and Education

We are committed to continuous learning and knowledge exchange across teams. We believe that effective collaboration requires a deep understanding of both the legal and technical aspects of our work, which is why we've established a robust cross-disciplinary knowledge sharing program.

Our patent attorneys educate our technical teams through regular training sessions, ensuring everyone understands the fundamentals of intellectual property law and how it applies to our AI solutions. These sessions cover key aspects like patent drafting, prosecution strategies, and the ethical considerations surrounding AI in the legal field.

In turn, our engineering and AI teams conduct knowledge-sharing sessions with the attorneys, keeping them informed about the latest advancements in AI technology, including the capabilities and limitations of different models. This two-way exchange of expertise creates a shared understanding that strengthens our collaborative environment and enables us to develop solutions that are both technically sophisticated and legally sound.

Benefits to Patent Copilot

Through the collaborative approach outlined above, our Patent Copilot delivers key advantages that transform patent practice:

Increased Efficiency: Our attorney-guided development has created AI tools that reduce drafting time by 40-60%, streamlining routine sections and figure management while maintaining consistent output quality across multiple applications.

Enhanced Quality: By automating routine tasks, attorneys can focus more time on complex drafting elements, inventor interactions, and strategic claim development - ultimately producing higher quality applications.

Flexible Integration: Built with direct input from practicing attorneys, our Patent Copilot adapts to individual drafting styles and workflows, allowing attorneys to leverage AI assistance while maintaining their preferred practices and client-specific requirements.

As we continue to evolve and expand our AI platforms, our collaborative approach combining legal and technical expertise will remain central to our mission. We're committed to developing solutions that not only leverage the latest in AI technology, but are also deeply rooted in the practical needs and professional standards of patent attorneys worldwide.

AI for patents.

Be 50%+ more productive. Join thousands of legal professionals around the World using Solve’s Patent Copilot™ for drafting, prosecution, invention harvesting, and more.

Related articles

IPO European Committee Conference 2025: A Fireside Chat on IP and AI

At the European Practice Conference hosted by the IP Owners Association in Paris, one fireside chat stood out for its insight and urgency: “IP Trends and Developments in AI.”

The session was led by two highly respected experts: Jean-François Adam, who covers all things European and currently serves as in-house counsel at Infineon Technologies, and Jonathan Osha, founding partner of Osha Bergman Watanabe & Burton LLP, who brought the US perspective. OBWB, a long-time thought leader in cross-border IP, was also the hosting sponsor of this year’s event, held at the elegant Hôtel le Marois in central Paris. 

Together, Jean-François and Jonathan offered a compelling look into the evolving challenges of patenting artificial intelligence-based inventions – and why practitioners on both sides of the Atlantic are grappling with inconsistent, outdated frameworks that do not sufficiently reflect the reality of modern innovation implementing AI.

G1/23: Marketed Products Are Prior Art

The Enlarged Board of Appeal issued its decision in G1/23 on July 2, 2025, addressing whether products put on the market before a patent filing date form part of the prior art when their composition or internal structure cannot be reproduced by the skilled person.

AI Claim Charting - Patent Prosecution

Patent prosecution has always hinged on precision, speed, and strategic foresight. Yet as Office Actions grow in both volume and complexity—often bundling multiple §§102 (novelty) and 103 (obviousness) rejections grounded in nuanced claim interpretations and an ever-expanding body of prior art—the traditional toolkit of the patent professional faces serious challenges. Manual claim charting, painstaking annotation of cited references, and labor‑intensive crafting of responses under tight deadlines can create bottlenecks, drive up costs, and leave room for human error.

Enter AI-powered claim charting: a suite of advanced natural language processing (NLP), machine‑learning (ML), and knowledge‑representation technologies that is rapidly reinventing each step of the Office Action workflow. By automating the generation of claim charts, surfacing hidden flaws in Examiner rejections, semantically analyzing claim language, and even proposing targeted response strategies, AI tools are transforming how attorneys and agents prosecute patents.

In this post, we’ll explore four core capabilities of AI‑driven claim charting and how they bring both speed and insight to Office Action responses:

  1. Automated analysis of Examiner rejections
  2. Instant flagging of issues and gaps
  3. Holistic assessment of claim language and prior art
  4. AI‑generated response strategies

The 5 Best Patent Proofreading Software Solutions for Law Firms (2025)

Key Takeaways

  • Proofreading software has become essential: Manual checks can’t keep pace with growing patent complexity and filing volumes. AI solutions can help prevent costly errors, office actions, and post-grant risks.

  • Most legacy solutions fall short of quality control: Many platforms rely on basic rule-based checks, lack real-time drafting integration, and offer limited jurisdictional support, creating workflow gaps and added manual work.
  • Solve Intelligence for AI-assisted patent review: With seamless drafting integration, tracked changes, auto-propagation of edits, and multi-jurisdiction compliance, Solve Intelligence provides unmatched accuracy and efficiency.