Patent Attorneys at Solve Intelligence: Building AI for Patent Practice

At Solve Intelligence, we build AI tools for patent attorneys. This means a design philosophy of developing, testing and refining our platforms specifically with our end-users in mind. We recognize that in order to build the best AI tools for patent attorneys, patent attorneys themselves must be involved in the development process. Their domain expertise, combined with the advanced technical knowledge of our AI and engineering teams, ensures our Patent Copilot isn’t just innovative—it’s tailored to the realities of patent practice, delivering solutions that truly work for attorneys. In this article, we explain what our patent attorneys do here at Solve, and how they collaborate with our wider team and customers to deliver our AI solutions.

Patent Attorneys at Solve Intelligence: Building AI for Patent Practice

Product Development

Our IP team at Solve includes patent attorneys with multi-jurisdictional experience and diverse technical backgrounds. The team plays a pivotal role in shaping our Patent Copilot. From ideation to implementation, their expertise is central to our development process. Here’s how they contribute:

Defining the Problem Space: Our patent attorneys identify the most time-consuming and error-prone tasks in drafting and prosecution, such as claim construction, incorporating edits to lengthy specifications, and prior art analysis.

Collaborating on Feature Design: Our attorneys work closely with our AI and engineering teams to design features that simplify these tasks. For instance, our Patent Drafting Copilot’s functionality was developed with direct input from attorneys in our team who understand the intricacies of patent drafting, and how this can differ for chemical compositions and computer-implemented inventions, for example.

Rigorous Testing: Once features are implemented, our patent attorneys rigorously test them in real-world scenarios and provide critical feedback to fine-tune performance.

Customer Success: Our IP team is uniquely positioned to quickly understand and address customer feedback, even if such feedback stems from a relatively niche area of patent law. Our attorneys are able to leverage their legal expertise to implement custom solutions and new features within our platforms based on customer feedback, with the help of the wider team here at Solve.

Beyond their role in product development, our IP team manages our own intellectual property portfolio - including drafting and prosecuting our own patent applications. This work gives our attorneys first-hand experience of our Patent Copilot, and with it, the opportunity to provide further feedback for the development process.

Collaboration and Education

We are committed to continuous learning and knowledge exchange across teams. We believe that effective collaboration requires a deep understanding of both the legal and technical aspects of our work, which is why we've established a robust cross-disciplinary knowledge sharing program.

Our patent attorneys educate our technical teams through regular training sessions, ensuring everyone understands the fundamentals of intellectual property law and how it applies to our AI solutions. These sessions cover key aspects like patent drafting, prosecution strategies, and the ethical considerations surrounding AI in the legal field.

In turn, our engineering and AI teams conduct knowledge-sharing sessions with the attorneys, keeping them informed about the latest advancements in AI technology, including the capabilities and limitations of different models. This two-way exchange of expertise creates a shared understanding that strengthens our collaborative environment and enables us to develop solutions that are both technically sophisticated and legally sound.

Benefits to Patent Copilot

Through the collaborative approach outlined above, our Patent Copilot delivers key advantages that transform patent practice:

Increased Efficiency: Our attorney-guided development has created AI tools that reduce drafting time by 40-60%, streamlining routine sections and figure management while maintaining consistent output quality across multiple applications.

Enhanced Quality: By automating routine tasks, attorneys can focus more time on complex drafting elements, inventor interactions, and strategic claim development - ultimately producing higher quality applications.

Flexible Integration: Built with direct input from practicing attorneys, our Patent Copilot adapts to individual drafting styles and workflows, allowing attorneys to leverage AI assistance while maintaining their preferred practices and client-specific requirements.

As we continue to evolve and expand our AI platforms, our collaborative approach combining legal and technical expertise will remain central to our mission. We're committed to developing solutions that not only leverage the latest in AI technology, but are also deeply rooted in the practical needs and professional standards of patent attorneys worldwide.

AI for patents.

Be 50%+ more productive. Join thousands of legal professionals around the world using Solve’s Patent Copilot™ for drafting, prosecution, invention harvesting, and more.

Related articles

Patent Landscape Analysis: How R&D Teams Identify Whitespace

R&D teams use patent landscape analysis to locate uncharted areas of a technology field, assess freedom-to-operate (FTO), and focus development resources on the areas of highest commercial value and broadest potential claim coverage.

Key takeaways

  • A patent landscape search locates whitespace; a novelty search locates prior art blockers. 
  • Patent landscape outputs require contextual analysis; volume alone does not determine opportunity or density.
  • Solve’s Charts tool scans millions of patents from a single file upload and leverages agentic searching, replacing manual iterative keyword & semantic search.

What IPBC Global 2026 in San Diego Revealed about the Future of IP

At IPBC Global 2026, Solve Intelligence was proud to be a sponsor of the conversations shaping the future of intellectual property. At the conference, we demonstrated how our platform amplifies end-to-end patent workflows, including licensing, litigation, and IP-backed finance.

Key takeaways

  • Generic LLMs cannot perform the structured legal reasoning and claim analysis that patent licensing and litigation require.
  • AI lowers the cost of analysing portfolios, from claim-to-product mappings to validity analyses, accelerating both sides of licensing negotiations.
  • IP-backed finance, insurance, and M&A due diligence are growing in sophistication and volume.
  • The profession faces a capacity gap that generic AI tools are not designed to close.

What Is a Freedom to Operate Analysis, and How Does AI Speed It Up?

A freedom to operate (FTO) analysis is a claim-by-claim assessment of whether a commercial activity would infringe any third-party patents in the markets where it will take place. AI speeds it up by handling the parts that scale badly by hand: surfacing relevant patents, mapping product features against claims element by element, pulling legal status by jurisdiction, and producing a cited, structured draft for the attorney to review and refine.

Key takeaways

• FTO analysis determines whether a product infringes third-party patents.

• A valid patent on your own invention doesn’t guarantee freedom to operate.

• AI compresses the slowest stages of FTO, including search, triage, and element-by-element claim mapping, while the attorney retains the legal judgment and owns the opinion.

• Generalist AI and purpose-built patent tools share a surface format; but FTO reliability depends on integration, not interface.

How to Build an Invalidity Claim Chart: A Practical Guide

An invalidity claim chart is a structured document that maps, for example, each limitation of a patent claim against prior art to show the patent should never have been granted. If you’re defending against infringement allegations, preparing an IPR petition, opposing a European patent, or advising a client on patent risk, knowing how to build one correctly is non-negotiable.

Key takeaways

• A well-built invalidity chart maps every claim limitation to prior art, element by element, with pinpoint citations to the exact column, line, page, or figure.

• When IPRs reach a final written decision, the PTAB now finds every challenged claim unpatentable around 70% of the time; and the chart is a key component of getting a petition instituted in the first place.

• Solve Intelligence’s Charts generates fully cited, limitation-by-limitation invalidity charts in minutes rather than days, flags weak limitation coverage candidly, and lets attorneys inspect the reasoning behind every mapping.