AI Patent Drafting with Example-Based Customization

Solve Intelligence's AI software now automatically configures itself from provided patent examples to adopt their unique drafting style, enhancing personalization and streamlining the patent drafting process for attorneys.

AI Patent Drafting with Example-Based Customization

The craft of patent drafting is one that continually evolves, and so too must the tools that support this vital work. At Solve Intelligence, we recognize the necessity for precision and personalization in patent creation. To further aid patent attorneys in crafting documents that reflect their client's inventions accurately, we've enhanced our software with a capability that allows for example-based AI configuration. This new feature enables attorneys to input existing patents, from which the AI can configure itself to mimic the document's unique drafting style.

Integrating Patent Examples for Tailored AI Drafting

By providing the AI with an example of an existing patent, attorneys can now swiftly configure the software to draft in the same style. This function is a significant step forward in efficiency, offering a form of bespoke automation that respects the unique nature of each patent's composition. When an attorney uploads a patent document, the AI analyzes it and presents a set of identified stylistic elements, such as language patterns, claim structures, and formatting preferences.

Interactive Style Adaptation

Once the AI has presented its analysis, attorneys have full control to edit, correct, and refine the identified elements. This interactive process not only ensures that the AI's understanding aligns with the attorney's standards but also allows for the development of a more sophisticated drafting style that can be applied consistently across future documents.

Educational Insight into Patent Claims Examples

This functionality also serves an educational role, highlighting for attorneys the specific stylistic elements that characterize different patent claims examples. This can be an invaluable tool for junior attorneys and those looking to deepen their understanding of varied patent structures and terminologies.

Enhancing Quality with Precision and Personalization

The essence of high-quality patent drafting lies in the details. Our software's ability to configure itself from patent examples and allow attorneys to refine the AI's output ensures that each patent reflects the precision and personalization necessary for robust protection.

Confidentiality in Style Configuration

As with all features of Solve Intelligence's software, confidentiality remains paramount. The process of teaching the AI through patent examples is secure and proprietary, ensuring that the unique styles and strategic approaches of each firm remain confidential.

Conclusion

Patent attorneys are tasked with not only protecting innovation but also ensuring that the narrative of a patent application accurately reflects the novelty and scope of an invention. With our latest update, Solve Intelligence's software empowers legal professionals to efficiently produce patent documents that honor the uniqueness of each invention with a newfound level of ease and precision. The integration of patent claims examples into the drafting process exemplifies our commitment to continual improvement and support for the intellectual property community.

AI for patents.

Be 50%+ more productive. Join thousands of legal professionals around the World using Solve’s Patent Copilot™ for drafting, prosecution, invention harvesting, and more.

Related articles

G1/23: Marketed Products Are Prior Art

The Enlarged Board of Appeal issued its decision in G1/23 on July 2, 2025, addressing whether products put on the market before a patent filing date form part of the prior art when their composition or internal structure cannot be reproduced by the skilled person.

AI Claim Charting - Patent Prosecution

Patent prosecution has always hinged on precision, speed, and strategic foresight. Yet as Office Actions grow in both volume and complexity—often bundling multiple §§102 (novelty) and 103 (obviousness) rejections grounded in nuanced claim interpretations and an ever-expanding body of prior art—the traditional toolkit of the patent professional faces serious challenges. Manual claim charting, painstaking annotation of cited references, and labor‑intensive crafting of responses under tight deadlines can create bottlenecks, drive up costs, and leave room for human error.

Enter AI-powered claim charting: a suite of advanced natural language processing (NLP), machine‑learning (ML), and knowledge‑representation technologies that is rapidly reinventing each step of the Office Action workflow. By automating the generation of claim charts, surfacing hidden flaws in Examiner rejections, semantically analyzing claim language, and even proposing targeted response strategies, AI tools are transforming how attorneys and agents prosecute patents.

In this post, we’ll explore four core capabilities of AI‑driven claim charting and how they bring both speed and insight to Office Action responses:

  1. Automated analysis of Examiner rejections
  2. Instant flagging of issues and gaps
  3. Holistic assessment of claim language and prior art
  4. AI‑generated response strategies

The 5 Best Patent Proofreading Software Solutions for Law Firms (2025)

Key Takeaways

  • Proofreading software has become essential: Manual checks can’t keep pace with growing patent complexity and filing volumes. AI solutions can help prevent costly errors, office actions, and post-grant risks.

  • Most legacy solutions fall short of quality control: Many platforms rely on basic rule-based checks, lack real-time drafting integration, and offer limited jurisdictional support, creating workflow gaps and added manual work.
  • Solve Intelligence for AI-assisted patent review: With seamless drafting integration, tracked changes, auto-propagation of edits, and multi-jurisdiction compliance, Solve Intelligence provides unmatched accuracy and efficiency.

G 1/24 Decision: EPO Clarifies Claim Interpretation

The Enlarged Board of Appeal issued its decision in case G 1/24 on 18 June 2025, concluding that "The description and drawings shall always be consulted to interpret the claims when assessing the patentability of an invention under Articles 52 to 57 EPC, and not only if the person skilled in the art finds a claim to be unclear or ambiguous when read in isolation."