How Solve Intelligence Expands the Offerings of Small Patent Firms

Solve Intelligence cuts the time attorneys spend on patent work by half. This lets a solo practitioner or small patent firm widen their offering without widening headcount. Work that a small practice once had to outsource can now be brought in-house, including creating patent drawings and prior art searching. The results are faster turnaround and higher margins for small firms. These time savings also free up capacity to offer ancillary services like landscaping, freedom-to-operate analysis, and infringement detection, work that was historically hard to do for small firms because of the manual effort involved.

Key Takeaways:

  • AI lets small firms bring outsourced work back in-house, including patent drawings and prior art search, improving margins and shortening turnaround.
  • AI makes patent attorneys more productive, freeing capacity for landscaping, FTO, and infringement detection work.
  • Patent work is structurally complex, so purpose-built patent AI, not a general chatbot, is what delivers reliable output.
How Solve Intelligence Expands the Offerings of Small Patent Firms

Small firms are constrained by capacity, not skill

Plenty of the best patent attorneys run small shops or practice solo. The constraint on a one- or two-attorney practice is rarely legal skill. The work happens in sequence, in the hours left after running the business, and pieces of it routinely get sent out, figures to an illustrator and prior art searches to a search provider.

Every one of those handoffs costs money, adds turnaround time, and takes a slice of the matter out of the firm's hands. That is exactly where Solve Intelligence can make a difference. The tasks that small firms have leaned on outside help for are the structured, repeatable tasks AI now handles as a fast first pass, with the attorney reviewing and finishing the work.

Small firms are well placed to move quickly

A small practice can adopt a tool and put it to work on a live matter the same week. That agility is showing up in the numbers. Clio's 2026 Legal Trends for Solo and Small Law Firms report found that 71% of solo practitioners and 75% of small firms now use AI in some capacity, and around 40% of solos plan to adopt AI in the next six months. Smokeball's 2025 State of Law Report found that generative-AI adoption among small US firms and solo practitioners nearly doubled in two years, from 27% in 2023 to 53% by early 2025.

The firms that benefit most approach AI deliberately. Thomson Reuters research found that firms with a visible, structured AI strategy were 3.5 times more likely to see a return on investment than those without one.

Bringing outsourced work back in-house

The most direct win for a small patent firm is reducing what it has to send out. Each capability brought in-house keeps more of the matter with the firm, and removes a step from the timeline.

  • Patent figures and drawings: Formal figures have traditionally gone to illustrators, adding cost and a turnaround loop on every application. Solve Intelligence’s built-in Figure Editor lets an attorney generate and iterate on drawings, and easily handle element labels.
  • Prior art search: Solve Intelligence's Agentic Search, available across all products, brings a capability historically outsourced to search firms within reach of a small firm. The agent operates directly on patent and non-patent literature, standards, and chemical structures, and drafts the results into a presentable report.

Widening the services you can offer

Outsourcing less is about keeping existing work in-house. The bigger opportunity is adding services the firm could not realistically offer before. Contentious work has long been the preserve of practices with dedicated search teams and analysts, because it is high-volume and scales badly by hand. 

  • Freedom-to-operate analyses: FTO is element-by-element claim mapping against in-force rights, jurisdiction by jurisdiction; classic table work that Solve Intelligence can draft and a practitioner can finish, opening up clearance opinions as a high-value offering (see What Is a Freedom to Operate Analysis, and How Does AI Speed It Up?).
  • Infringement detection, invalidity, and claim charts: Mapping claim limitations to prior art, to a potentially infringing product, or to a technical standard is exactly the structured, citation-heavy work Solve Intelligence accelerates, letting a small firm support litigation, licensing, and SEP matters it might otherwise refer out (see How to Build an Invalidity Claim Chart).
  • Patent landscaping and portfolio review: Surveying a whole technology area or auditing a client's portfolio becomes feasible when retrieval and summarization across these data sources are automated, turning a research project into a deliverable a small firm can sell.

Why a general chatbot is not enough

A solo attorney experimenting with a consumer chatbot will get useful help with a summary or a cover letter and may conclude AI is "good enough." Patent work is where that breaks down. 

Claim construction, jurisdiction-specific drafting, and element-by-element analysis depend on patent and non-patent literature search, examination guidelines and court procedures. A general model is not wired into any of that, so each piece becomes a separate manual step before its output can be trusted.

This is why purpose-built tooling like Solve Intelligence tends to deliver the efficiency gains, around 3-4x on structured patent tasks, that generalist tools applied to the same work do not. For most firms the two are complementary: a generalist platform for broad office work, and a patent-specific tool for the structurally complex patent tasks.

What Solve Intelligence offers solo and small patent firms

Solve Intelligence builds AI specifically for patent professionals, and the Patent Copilot™ is available to a solo practitioner or small firm just as it is to any firm. That means a small practice can bring more of the matter in-house, across the workflows where small firms feel the squeeze most. It is used by 700+ IP teams allowing:

  • Invention Harvesting, Drafting, Prosecution, and Charts in one place: A solo attorney can run a matter from disclosure to filing to prosecution without stitching together separate tools or vendors.
  • Figure generation in the workflow: Drawings can be built and iterated alongside the draft, reducing reliance on an outside draftsperson.
  • Patent-grade search across every source: Charts draws on search across more than 170 million publications in 107 jurisdictions, alongside non-patent literature and technical standards, with legal status and patent term pulled automatically, putting the reach that unlocks search, FTO, and landscaping services within range of a solo practice.
  • Security built for confidential material: Solve Intelligence is SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 certified, and ISO 42001, GDPR, and CCPA compliant, with zero-data-retention agreements across every LLM provider, so inputs and outputs are not stored, logged, or used for training. More details are available in the Trust Center.

FAQs

What work can a small firm stop outsourcing?

Mainly patent figures, prior art searching, and first-pass drafting of specifications and claims. Bringing these in-house keeps more of the matter, and its margin, with the firm while shortening the timeline.

Is general-purpose AI like ChatGPT good enough for patent work?

For general office tasks, yes; for patent-specific work like claim drafting, prosecution, FTO, and invalidity analysis, no. It is not connected to the literature search and patent-office data that work depends on, so most firms use both.

Do I have to tell the USPTO I used AI to draft an application?

Under the USPTO's 2024 guidance, there is no specific duty to disclose that AI tools were used in preparing a filing. However, the practitioner signing the paper must have reviewed and verified its contents; relying on the accuracy of an AI tool is not a reasonable inquiry, and the duty of candor and good faith applies regardless of how a document was produced.

Is it safe to put confidential invention details into an AI tool?

It can be, provided the tool is built for it. All firms, irrespective of size, should require zero-data-retention terms so inputs and outputs are not stored or used for training, along with encryption and recognized certifications. Solve Intelligence maintains zero-data-retention agreements with its LLM providers and is SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 certified; documentation is available in the Trust Center.

AI for patents.

Be 50%+ more productive. Join thousands of legal professionals around the world using Solve’s Patent Copilot™ for drafting, prosecution, invention harvesting, and more.

Related articles

Page White Farrer Adopts Solve Intelligence for AI-Assisted Patent Drafting

Page White Farrer Adopts Solve Intelligence and Solve's AI Templates

Page White Farrer ("PWF"), a specialist intellectual property firm with a longstanding focus on technology-driven innovation, has selected Solve Intelligence to support patent application drafting following an extensive evaluation of available AI tools. The firm has initially deployed the platform within its technology-focused patent teams, supporting work across sectors such as AI, software, telecommunications, electronics, semiconductors and engineering. 

The firm's objective was not to automate legal judgement or replace attorney expertise, but to accelerate the preparation of high-quality first drafts of patent applications. By combining AI-assisted drafting with custom templates tailored to the firm's preferred drafting approaches, Solve Intelligence helps attorneys move from an initial claim set to a reviewable first draft more efficiently while maintaining consistency and technical accuracy. 

For this partnership, PWF's primary focus was on configuring the platform around the firm's own drafting conventions, client preferences and established best practices, ensuring that the technology supports the way its attorneys already work. 

The Honest Risks of Using AI in Patent Prosecution

AI is changing how patent prosecution gets done, and the upside is real. So are the downsides: hallucinated citations, confidentiality exposure, export-control pitfalls, and prosecution-history estoppel. This is an honest account of the risks of AI patent software in prosecution, and what actually reduces each one.

Key takeaways

  • Anyone presenting AI-assisted content to the USPTO must reasonably review it; relying on the tool's accuracy alone is not enough.
  • Courts have already sanctioned attorneys for AI-hallucinated citations, and similar risk applies to office-action responses and PTAB briefs.
  • The USPTO warns that AI tools on foreign servers can raise export-control, foreign-filing-license, and national-security problems.
  • Grounded citations, exposed reasoning, zero data retention, and attorney oversight are what materially reduce AI risk in patent prosecution.

Maiwald Chooses Solve Intelligence for Selected AI-Supported IP Workflows

Solve Intelligence is proud to share that Maiwald, one of Germany’s largest and most progressive intellectual property firms, works with Solve Intelligence on selected AI-supported workflows in its patent and legal practice groups. Following an evaluation period during which selected functionalities were assessed for approved internal use cases, Maiwald and Solve have formed an enterprise partnership for 2026.

The rollout reflects the same careful approach Maiwald brings to its client work. Solve enables customers in Europe to process data on servers located within Europe and holds recognized information-security certifications. In addition, Solve offers contractual commitments designed to protect confidential professional information in line with applicable statutory confidentiality obligations and professional conduct requirements. Against that background, any use of AI-supported tools took place only within approved governance structures and under applicable professional, contractual, confidentiality and data-protection requirements.

That balance of innovation and professional judgment is characteristic of Maiwald. The firm has spent decades setting a standard for IP work in Europe: rigorous prosecution, a formidable contentious practice, and interdisciplinary teams of patent attorneys and attorneys-at-law working side by side. The firm approached AI the same way, methodically, with a clear sense of where it adds leverage and where an experienced attorney’s judgment remains irreplaceable. 

PTAB Case Studies of AI Disclosure Requirements: Part II

This article is the second of a series of Patent Trial & Appeal Board (PTAB) case studies (see Part I), which aims to inform applicants’ approach to satisfying the written description and enablement requirements for patenting artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning technologies.