Solve Intelligence and HGF Partner to Deliver Custom AI Patent Drafting Workflows

Solve Intelligence is pleased to announce a strategic partnership with HGF, one of Europe’s leading intellectual property firms. The collaboration is focused on a clear objective: customising AI-driven drafting workflows to meet the specific needs of HGF and some of its clients.

Rather than adopting a one-size-fits-all approach, HGF is working closely with Solve Intelligence to shape how the drafting platform behaves across different technologies, client preferences, and drafting styles. The built-in, customisable features available in Solve’s platform are what makes this possible.

"We evaluated the field carefully before committing. Solve Intelligence delivered the drafting quality our attorneys demand and integrated seamlessly into how they already work. We are investing in the foundation for HGF's future practice."

Richard Hodkinson, Chief Technology Officer at HGF

Solve Intelligence and HGF Partner to Deliver Custom AI Patent Drafting Workflows

Moving Beyond Generic AI Drafting

A key challenge in AI adoption for patent drafting is that generic outputs rarely meet the standards required in practice. Differences in client expectations, technical fields, and internal drafting approaches mean that flexibility is critical.

HGF’s approach reflects this reality:

  • Adapting drafting outputs to align with client-specific preferences
  • Embedding firm-specific style and structural conventions
  • Ensuring consistency across teams working in similar technical domains

This shifts AI from a general-purpose drafting aid to a more tailored system that reflects how the firm’s attorneys actually work.

How HGF is Customising Solve Intelligence

HGF is actively configuring the Solve Intelligence drafting module to support more precise, client-aligned outputs.

This includes:

  • Adjusting how applications are structured depending on client requirements
  • Tailoring claim language and fallback positions to preferred styles
  • Incorporating prior work product to guide tone, terminology, and level of detail
  • Iterating on outputs to reflect different levels of drafting conservatism

These customisations allow attorneys to generate patent application drafts that are closer to “client-ready” from the outset, reducing rework while maintaining full attorney control, and allowing HGF attorneys to focus on areas requiring commercial and legal judgement.

A Practitioner-Led Implementation

Importantly, this is not a static deployment. HGF’s attorneys are working closely with attorneys at Solve Intelligence and are directly involved in refining how the system behaves in practice.

This ongoing feedback loop ensures that:

  • Outputs improve over time in line with real drafting decisions
  • The system reflects jurisdictional-specific drafting requirements
  • Customisation evolves alongside client needs and portfolio strategies
"At HGF, the quality of a patent is set at the drafting stage. Solve Intelligence takes the routine effort out of drafting so our attorneys can concentrate their expertise where it matters most. It lets us draft more efficiently without ever compromising the technical rigour our clients rely on us for."

Richard Hodkinson, Chief Technology Officer at HGF

What This Signals for the Market

This partnership highlights a broader shift in how leading firms are adopting AI for patent drafting.

The focus should not be on generic automation but rather move towards:

  • Firm-specific and client-specific configuration
  • Greater control over drafting style and legal positioning
  • AI systems that reflect institutional knowledge, not just public data

In practice, the firms that benefit most from AI will be those that actively shape and customise the tools they use. It is exactly this approach that HGF has chosen.

David Joo, Founding Member of Solve Intelligence, states:

“I have seen HGF in practice for the past decade and it is clear why their clients consider them Europe’s IP firm of choice. HGF delivers commercially focussed and technology-enabled solutions, guided by their core values in people and excellence.”

Looking Ahead

Solve Intelligence and HGF will continue to deepen this collaboration, with a focus on expanding customisation capabilities and embedding them more deeply into drafting workflows.

For patent professionals, the key question is no longer whether to use AI in drafting, but how far it can be tailored to reflect the way they and their clients actually work.

AI for patents.

Be 50%+ more productive. Join thousands of legal professionals around the world using Solve’s Patent Copilot™ for drafting, prosecution, invention harvesting, and more.

Related articles

Page White Farrer Adopts Solve Intelligence for AI-Assisted Patent Drafting

Page White Farrer Adopts Solve Intelligence and Solve's AI Templates

Page White Farrer ("PWF"), a specialist intellectual property firm with a longstanding focus on technology-driven innovation, has selected Solve Intelligence to support patent application drafting following an extensive evaluation of available AI tools. The firm has initially deployed the platform within its technology-focused patent teams, supporting work across sectors such as AI, software, telecommunications, electronics, semiconductors and engineering. 

The firm's objective was not to automate legal judgement or replace attorney expertise, but to accelerate the preparation of high-quality first drafts of patent applications. By combining AI-assisted drafting with custom templates tailored to the firm's preferred drafting approaches, Solve Intelligence helps attorneys move from an initial claim set to a reviewable first draft more efficiently while maintaining consistency and technical accuracy. 

For this partnership, PWF's primary focus was on configuring the platform around the firm's own drafting conventions, client preferences and established best practices, ensuring that the technology supports the way its attorneys already work. 

The Honest Risks of Using AI in Patent Prosecution

AI is changing how patent prosecution gets done, and the upside is real. So are the downsides: hallucinated citations, confidentiality exposure, export-control pitfalls, and prosecution-history estoppel. This is an honest account of the risks of AI patent software in prosecution, and what actually reduces each one.

Key takeaways

  • Anyone presenting AI-assisted content to the USPTO must reasonably review it; relying on the tool's accuracy alone is not enough.
  • Courts have already sanctioned attorneys for AI-hallucinated citations, and similar risk applies to office-action responses and PTAB briefs.
  • The USPTO warns that AI tools on foreign servers can raise export-control, foreign-filing-license, and national-security problems.
  • Grounded citations, exposed reasoning, zero data retention, and attorney oversight are what materially reduce AI risk in patent prosecution.

Maiwald Chooses Solve Intelligence for Selected AI-Supported IP Workflows

Solve Intelligence is proud to share that Maiwald, one of Germany’s largest and most progressive intellectual property firms, works with Solve Intelligence on selected AI-supported workflows in its patent and legal practice groups. Following an evaluation period during which selected functionalities were assessed for approved internal use cases, Maiwald and Solve have formed an enterprise partnership for 2026.

The rollout reflects the same careful approach Maiwald brings to its client work. Solve enables customers in Europe to process data on servers located within Europe and holds recognized information-security certifications. In addition, Solve offers contractual commitments designed to protect confidential professional information in line with applicable statutory confidentiality obligations and professional conduct requirements. Against that background, any use of AI-supported tools took place only within approved governance structures and under applicable professional, contractual, confidentiality and data-protection requirements.

That balance of innovation and professional judgment is characteristic of Maiwald. The firm has spent decades setting a standard for IP work in Europe: rigorous prosecution, a formidable contentious practice, and interdisciplinary teams of patent attorneys and attorneys-at-law working side by side. The firm approached AI the same way, methodically, with a clear sense of where it adds leverage and where an experienced attorney’s judgment remains irreplaceable. 

PTAB Case Studies of AI Disclosure Requirements: Part II

This article is the second of a series of Patent Trial & Appeal Board (PTAB) case studies (see Part I), which aims to inform applicants’ approach to satisfying the written description and enablement requirements for patenting artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning technologies.