Solve Intelligence acquires ClaimWise to strengthen European workflows

Solve Intelligence has acquired ClaimWise, an AI start-up for European patent attorneys. With the acquisition of ClaimWise, Solve Intelligence is bolstering its support for European prosecution, opposition and litigation workflows, cementing its place as the go-to AI platform for European patent practice.

ClaimWise is our second acquisition this year, following Palito earlier in 2026. With this acquisition, Solve Intelligence now serves over 600 firms and in-house teams.

Solve Intelligence acquires ClaimWise to strengthen European workflows

Key takeaways

  • ClaimWise is Solve Intelligence's second acquisition in 2026, bringing the platform to 600+ IP teams globally.
  • The acquisition deepens both our capabilities and support across EPO opposition, litigation, and prosecution workflows.
  • ClaimWise serves 50+ firms across the Nordics, Benelux, DACH, Italy, and Spain.

Why EPO and national procedures demand different AI approaches

Patent practice in Europe is split between the EPO and national offices. The EPO received a record 200,000+ applications in 2025. A single EPO application can be granted in 30+ states, and a single opposition can revoke them all at once. In parallel, European patent attorneys also handle a lot of work for national applications. 

The DPMA alone takes almost 60,000 applications a year, all filed in German under national procedure. That's why building great products for European patent attorneys means understanding the different procedures and ways of working across the EPO and the national offices of its member states.

Solve Intelligence has always supported European workflows - we have a large team of European patent attorneys from different technical fields that help to shape our products with our engineers. A significant share of our European customer base, across major firms and in-house teams in many EPC jurisdictions, already rely on us for drafting, prosecution, opposition and litigation. ClaimWise extends that foundation.

“The US is our biggest market, but we have customers across 6 continents, and we are rapidly growing in Europe,” said Chris Parsonson, Founder and CEO of Solve Intelligence. “ClaimWise has built great technology for European patent drafting, prosecution, opposition and litigation workflows being used by over 50 IP teams across key markets like Germany and the Nordics. Bringing ClaimWise into the Solve platform means customers get deeper and more powerful tools for all European patent workflows.”

What ClaimWise has built for European patent attorneys

ClaimWise is used by 50+ private practice firms and in-house IP teams across the Nordics, Benelux, DACH, Italy, and Spain. Their customers and use cases reflect the variety of European patent work: teams drafting life sciences applications, boutique firms preparing search opinion responses for non-EU filers, in-house teams reviewing outside counsel work, generics manufacturers filing oppositions, and more. 

For each customer, ClaimWise has been a partner rather than a tool. Years of close engagement taught the team how patent attorneys actually work across different fields of invention, firm types, and jurisdictions, and how AI fits into each.

"We spent a lot of time sitting next to patent attorneys, learning where AI helps and where it doesn't. Solve has been doing the same on a much larger scale, across the full patent lifecycle. Joining means the work we started reaches more attorneys, faster, and we get to keep building it with a team that thinks the same way about the craft."

Milo Moerkerke, Co-founder of ClaimWise

What the acquisition adds to the Solve Intelligence platform

For Solve Intelligence customers, the acquisition means even more support across EPO workflows for our European customers, drawing on years of close work with European attorneys. 

ClaimWise's DPMA integration will transfer directly to Solve Intelligence, alongside office action response and application drafting templates in the right language for each jurisdiction, and integration with office-specific case law. All of this will sit in one platform, covering the end-to-end lifecycle of patents, from drafting through to litigation. If you want to see what Solve Intelligence looks like across European drafting, prosecution, oppositions, and litigation, book a demo today

Frequently Asked Questions

1. What does this mean for existing Solve Intelligence customers?

Existing customers get expanded European patent support as part of their current subscription, with no action required. EPO and national-office workflows get deeper coverage, and ClaimWise's customer-tested approach to drafting, prosecution, and opposition feeds into the product roadmap.

2. How does ClaimWise integrate with the existing Solve Intelligence platform?

Over the coming months, ClaimWise is being merged directly into Solve rather than kept as a separate product. The DPMA integration, jurisdiction-specific templates, and office-specific case law become native parts of the Solve platform, so customers work in one system across drafting, prosecution, opposition, and litigation.

3. Does the acquisition change Solve Intelligence's roadmap for US workflows?

No. The US remains a large area of investment in the product roadmap, and that doesn't change with this acquisition. ClaimWise expands our European capabilities without redirecting resources from US workflows. Customers across the USPTO will continue to see ongoing investment in drafting, prosecution, opposition, and litigation support.

AI for patents.

Be 50%+ more productive. Join thousands of legal professionals around the World using Solve’s Patent Copilot™ for drafting, prosecution, invention harvesting, and more.

Related articles

Dan Rudoy to join Solve’s Customer Advisory Board

We are excited to welcome Dan Rudoy, Shareholder at Wolf Greenfield, to Solve Intelligence’s Customer Advisory Board.

EPO G 1/26: How the Coated Steel Strips Case Tests Article 123(2)

At Solve Intelligence, we build AI tools purpose-built for patent prosecution and opposition workflows. European teams, including cross-Atlantic firms like HG, use Solve Intelligence to stay ahead of EPO doctrine shifts as they happen. In this article, we cover the three referred questions in G 1/26, the practical implications for prosecution and opposition teams, and what to do before the decision lands.

Key takeaways

  • G 1/26 asks whether G 1/24's rule to consult the description extends from patentability assessment to Article 123(2) added matter.
  • The underlying case (T 873/24) turns on whether "ratio of titanium to nitrogen in excess of 3.42" means a weight ratio or a molar ratio.
  • The referral poses three sets of questions: admissibility under Article 112(1), the reach of the description in claim interpretation, and the consequences for Article 123(2).
  • If the Enlarged Board extends G 1/24 to Article 123(2), description-based narrowing applies to added-matter assessment across all European proceedings.

Built for IP: How Banner Witcoff Is Raising the Bar on Patent Work with Solve Intelligence

"We viewed our choice of AI platform as significant to the future of our patent practice. After extensively evaluating many products, we concluded that Solve Intelligence best met the needs of our attorneys and our clients." Laura Brutman, Shareholder, Banner Witcoff

Patents and Standards 2026: When SEP portfolios outgrow human review

The 8th UCL Patents and Standards conference brought together all the key standard essential patent (SEP) players on both the holder and implementer sides. 

By the end of day two, one technical question kept resurfacing across panels that were nominally discussing other topics. How does anyone actually assess essentiality and validity at the scale modern declared portfolios now reach? At Solve Intelligence, this is the question we have built our platform to answer.

Key takeaways

  • At today's portfolio scales, AI is a precondition for SEP essentiality and validity assessment, not an enhancement of human review.
  • Streaming standards are fully in SEP territory, bringing implementers with no licensing history into the same mapping problems as in cellular standards.
  • SEP disputes default to parallel multi-jurisdiction proceedings, requiring position alignment across every forum before the first filing.