Patent Drafting with Custom AI Styles

Solve Intelligence introduces customizable AI style presets in our patent drafting software, ensuring attorneys can infuse their unique style into efficient, high-quality patents while maintaining firm-specific confidentiality.

Patent Drafting with Custom AI Styles

The intricacies of patent drafting are well-known to IP professionals who navigate the complexities of patent law. The drafting process demands not only precision but also a reflection of the attorney's individual expertise and the client's innovative footprint. Acknowledging this, Solve Intelligence has introduced a nuanced feature within our patent drafting software that allows for deep customization – AI-style presets tailored to the attorney's drafting preferences.

Understanding the Need for Diverse Drafting Approaches

Patent attorneys and IP firms face a unique set of challenges brought forth by varying drafting requirements that span different technology sectors and jurisdictions. Each client’s needs dictate a distinct approach to the language, structure, and strategic presentation within a patent application. Our software has been developed to support these requirements, providing a platform that respects and facilitates the diversity of patent drafting techniques.

Customization at the Core of Patent Drafting

Our tool enables attorneys to configure the AI to align with their specific drafting styles. Through a user-friendly interface, you can establish style presets that cater to different clients or types of patent applications. This functionality is designed to preserve the attorney's unique drafting approach while benefiting from AI efficiency.

Prioritizing Confidentiality and Control

The proprietary nature of the style presets ensures that only the attorney or their firm can access these custom configurations. We've built this feature with a stringent focus on security to maintain the confidentiality that is paramount in the IP industry.

Streamlining Patent Writing without Compromising Quality

Efficiency in patent writing is crucial, and our patent writing software addresses this need without undermining the quality or personalized touch of each document. The AI assists by automating routine elements of drafting, allowing the attorney to focus on the strategic aspects of patent creation. Our goal is to provide a tool that complements the attorney’s expertise, not replace it.

The Technical Edge over Conventional Software

In contrast to conventional options, our platform is designed with the sophisticated needs of IP professionals in mind. The detailed customization contrasts with the broader strokes of generalist tools and offers a more refined and expertly tailored drafting experience.

Conclusion

Patent drafting is a specialized craft that blends legal acumen with an understanding of technological innovation. Solve Intelligence’s document editor with AI customization recognizes the need for a personalized, secure, and efficient approach to patent writing. We’ve tailored our software to enhance the meticulous work of patent attorneys and IP firms, ensuring the AI supports but does not supplant, the skilled human touch that defines quality patent drafting.

AI for patents.

Be 50%+ more productive. Join thousands of legal professionals around the World using Solve’s Patent Copilot™ for drafting, prosecution, invention harvesting, and more.

Related articles

G1/23: Marketed Products Are Prior Art

The Enlarged Board of Appeal issued its decision in G1/23 on July 2, 2025, addressing whether products put on the market before a patent filing date form part of the prior art when their composition or internal structure cannot be reproduced by the skilled person.

AI Claim Charting - Patent Prosecution

Patent prosecution has always hinged on precision, speed, and strategic foresight. Yet as Office Actions grow in both volume and complexity—often bundling multiple §§102 (novelty) and 103 (obviousness) rejections grounded in nuanced claim interpretations and an ever-expanding body of prior art—the traditional toolkit of the patent professional faces serious challenges. Manual claim charting, painstaking annotation of cited references, and labor‑intensive crafting of responses under tight deadlines can create bottlenecks, drive up costs, and leave room for human error.

Enter AI-powered claim charting: a suite of advanced natural language processing (NLP), machine‑learning (ML), and knowledge‑representation technologies that is rapidly reinventing each step of the Office Action workflow. By automating the generation of claim charts, surfacing hidden flaws in Examiner rejections, semantically analyzing claim language, and even proposing targeted response strategies, AI tools are transforming how attorneys and agents prosecute patents.

In this post, we’ll explore four core capabilities of AI‑driven claim charting and how they bring both speed and insight to Office Action responses:

  1. Automated analysis of Examiner rejections
  2. Instant flagging of issues and gaps
  3. Holistic assessment of claim language and prior art
  4. AI‑generated response strategies

The 5 Best Patent Proofreading Software Solutions for Law Firms (2025)

Key Takeaways

  • Proofreading software has become essential: Manual checks can’t keep pace with growing patent complexity and filing volumes. AI solutions can help prevent costly errors, office actions, and post-grant risks.

  • Most legacy solutions fall short of quality control: Many platforms rely on basic rule-based checks, lack real-time drafting integration, and offer limited jurisdictional support, creating workflow gaps and added manual work.
  • Solve Intelligence for AI-assisted patent review: With seamless drafting integration, tracked changes, auto-propagation of edits, and multi-jurisdiction compliance, Solve Intelligence provides unmatched accuracy and efficiency.

G 1/24 Decision: EPO Clarifies Claim Interpretation

The Enlarged Board of Appeal issued its decision in case G 1/24 on 18 June 2025, concluding that "The description and drawings shall always be consulted to interpret the claims when assessing the patentability of an invention under Articles 52 to 57 EPC, and not only if the person skilled in the art finds a claim to be unclear or ambiguous when read in isolation."