Revolutionising Patent Writing - Welcome to Solve Intelligence

Tl;dr: We use AI to help you write high-quality patents quickly. We do this by providing a simple in-browser document editor that any patent attorney or inventor can start using straight away

Revolutionising Patent Writing - Welcome to Solve Intelligence

From left to right: Solve Intelligence co-founders Angus, Sanj, and Chris (Angus's brother) in San Francisco.

What are we building?

Tl;dr: We use AI to help you write high-quality patents quickly. We do this by providing a simple in-browser document editor that any patent attorney or inventor can start using straight away

Our product can help with all stages of the patent life cycle, from writing and enhancing the initial invention disclosure and drafting the patent application to responding to office actions and opposition objections.

Why are we building it?

From drafting to grant, a worldwide patent costs $60K on average and can take years to obtain. If the patent is contentious, then costs can get much higher ($100K-1M+). It's a slow and expensive process which can block innovation and delay time-to-market.

There's a need for software solutions which can make the patenting process more efficient.

Most existing intellectual property software focuses on search (finding related technology). However, the generative steps of drafting a patent and responding to examiners and competitors make up 90%+ of the costs.

Enter AI, which now has the ability to help with generative patent tasks. At Solve Intelligence, we have assembled a world-class team of AI researchers and software developers. Our goal? To leverage and build on recent AI breakthroughs to transform the patenting process.

AI for patents.

Be 50%+ more productive. Join thousands of legal professionals around the World using Solve’s Patent Copilot™ for drafting, prosecution, invention harvesting, and more.

Related articles

AI Claim Charting - Patent Prosecution

Patent prosecution has always hinged on precision, speed, and strategic foresight. Yet as Office Actions grow in both volume and complexity—often bundling multiple §§102 (novelty) and 103 (obviousness) rejections grounded in nuanced claim interpretations and an ever-expanding body of prior art—the traditional toolkit of the patent professional faces serious challenges. Manual claim charting, painstaking annotation of cited references, and labor‑intensive crafting of responses under tight deadlines can create bottlenecks, drive up costs, and leave room for human error.

Enter AI-powered claim charting: a suite of advanced natural language processing (NLP), machine‑learning (ML), and knowledge‑representation technologies that is rapidly reinventing each step of the Office Action workflow. By automating the generation of claim charts, surfacing hidden flaws in Examiner rejections, semantically analyzing claim language, and even proposing targeted response strategies, AI tools are transforming how attorneys and agents prosecute patents.

In this post, we’ll explore four core capabilities of AI‑driven claim charting and how they bring both speed and insight to Office Action responses:

  1. Automated analysis of Examiner rejections
  2. Instant flagging of issues and gaps
  3. Holistic assessment of claim language and prior art
  4. AI‑generated response strategies

The 5 Best Patent Proofreading Software Solutions for Law Firms (2025)

Key Takeaways

  • Proofreading software has become essential: Manual checks can’t keep pace with growing patent complexity and filing volumes. AI solutions can help prevent costly errors, office actions, and post-grant risks.

  • Most legacy solutions fall short of quality control: Many platforms rely on basic rule-based checks, lack real-time drafting integration, and offer limited jurisdictional support, creating workflow gaps and added manual work.
  • Solve Intelligence for AI-assisted patent review: With seamless drafting integration, tracked changes, auto-propagation of edits, and multi-jurisdiction compliance, Solve Intelligence provides unmatched accuracy and efficiency.

G 1/24 Decision: EPO Clarifies Claim Interpretation

The Enlarged Board of Appeal issued its decision in case G 1/24 on 18 June 2025, concluding that "The description and drawings shall always be consulted to interpret the claims when assessing the patentability of an invention under Articles 52 to 57 EPC, and not only if the person skilled in the art finds a claim to be unclear or ambiguous when read in isolation."

Prior Art Search: 7 AI Tools Ranked for Patent Professionals

Discover 7 top AI tools for smarter prior art search, ranked and reviewed for patent professionals seeking innovation and accuracy